Literature DB >> 21784381

The inversion effect reveals species differences in face processing.

Lisa A Parr1.   

Abstract

Face recognition is a complex skill that requires the integration of facial features across the whole face, e.g., holistic processing. It is unclear whether, and to what extent, other species process faces in a manner that is similar to humans. Previous studies on the inversion effect, a marker of holistic processing, in nonhuman primates have revealed mixed results in part because many studies have failed to include alternative image categories necessary to understand whether the effects are truly face-specific. The present study re-examined the inversion effect in rhesus monkeys and chimpanzees using comparable testing methods and a variety of high quality stimuli including faces and nonfaces. The data support an inversion effect in chimpanzees only for conspecifics' faces (expert category), suggesting face-specific holistic processing similar to humans. Rhesus monkeys showed inversion effects for conspecifics, but also for heterospecifics' faces (chimpanzees), and nonfaces images (houses), supporting important species differences in this simple test of holistic face processing.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21784381      PMCID: PMC3208376          DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.06.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)        ISSN: 0001-6918


  27 in total

1.  Discrimination of faces and houses by rhesus monkeys: the role of stimulus expertise and rotation angle.

Authors:  Lisa A Parr; Matthew Heintz
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2008-02-07       Impact factor: 3.084

2.  Holistic processing for faces operates over a wide range of sizes but is strongest at identification rather than conversational distances.

Authors:  Elinor McKone
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-12-09       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  The face-inversion effect as a deficit in the encoding of configural information: direct evidence.

Authors:  A Freire; K Lee; L A Symons
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.490

4.  Becoming a "Greeble" expert: exploring mechanisms for face recognition.

Authors:  I Gauthier; M J Tarr
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Expertise and configural coding in face recognition.

Authors:  G Rhodes; S Tan; S Brake; K Taylor
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  1989-08

6.  Inversion and configuration of faces.

Authors:  J C Bartlett; J Searcy
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Margaret Thatcher: a new illusion.

Authors:  P Thompson
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 1.490

8.  Multiple perceptual strategies used by macaque monkeys for face recognition.

Authors:  Katalin M Gothard; Kelly N Brooks; Mary A Peterson
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2008-09-12       Impact factor: 3.084

9.  The perception of unfamiliar faces and houses by chimpanzees: influence of rotation angle.

Authors:  Lisa A Parr; Matthew Heintz
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.490

10.  Visual expertise does not predict the composite effect across species: a comparison between spider (Ateles geoffroyi) and rhesus (Macaca mulatta) monkeys.

Authors:  Jessica Taubert; Lisa A Parr
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2009-10-07       Impact factor: 2.310

View more
  6 in total

1.  The organization of conspecific face space in nonhuman primates.

Authors:  Lisa A Parr; Jessica Taubert; Anthony C Little; Peter J B Hancock
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 2.143

2.  Perceiving Animacy in Own-and Other-Species Faces.

Authors:  Benjamin Balas; Amanda Auen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-01-23

3.  Visual Perception of Photographs of Rotated 3D Objects in Goldfish (Carassius auratus).

Authors:  Jessica J Wegman; Evan Morrison; Kenneth Tyler Wilcox; Caroline M DeLong
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 3.231

4.  Comparing the face inversion effect in crows and humans.

Authors:  Katharina F Brecht; Lysann Wagener; Ljerka Ostojić; Nicola S Clayton; Andreas Nieder
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Body inversion effect in monkeys.

Authors:  Toyomi Matsuno; Kazuo Fujita
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Comparison of Object Recognition Behavior in Human and Monkey.

Authors:  Rishi Rajalingham; Kailyn Schmidt; James J DiCarlo
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 6.167

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.