Literature DB >> 18093766

Processing F0 with cochlear implants: Modulation frequency discrimination and speech intonation recognition.

Monita Chatterjee1, Shu-Chen Peng.   

Abstract

Fundamental frequency (F0) processing by cochlear implant (CI) listeners was measured using a psychophysical task and a speech intonation recognition task. Listeners' Weber fractions for modulation frequency discrimination were measured using an adaptive, 3-interval, forced-choice paradigm: stimuli were presented through a custom research interface. In the speech intonation recognition task, listeners were asked to indicate whether resynthesized bisyllabic words, when presented in the free field through the listeners' everyday speech processor, were question-like or statement-like. The resynthesized tokens were systematically manipulated to have different initial-F0s to represent male vs. female voices, and different F0 contours (i.e. falling, flat, and rising) Although the CI listeners showed considerable variation in performance on both tasks, significant correlations were observed between the CI listeners' sensitivity to modulation frequency in the psychophysical task and their performance in intonation recognition. Consistent with their greater reliance on temporal cues, the CI listeners' performance in the intonation recognition task was significantly poorer with the higher initial-F0 stimuli than with the lower initial-F0 stimuli. Similar results were obtained with normal hearing listeners attending to noiseband-vocoded CI simulations with reduced spectral resolution.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18093766      PMCID: PMC2237883          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2007.11.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  29 in total

1.  Coding of the fundamental frequency in continuous interleaved sampling processors for cochlear implants.

Authors:  L Geurts; J Wouters
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Modulation masking in cochlear implant listeners: envelope versus tonotopic components.

Authors:  Monita Chatterjee
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Temporal pitch in electric hearing.

Authors:  Fan Gang Zeng
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Correct tonotopic representation is necessary for complex pitch perception.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham; Joshua G W Bernstein; Hector Penagos
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-01-12       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Cochlear implant speech recognition with speech maskers.

Authors:  Ginger S Stickney; Fan-Gang Zeng; Ruth Litovsky; Peter Assmann
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Better place-coding of the fundamental frequency in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Luc Geurts; Jan Wouters
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  The role of spectral and temporal cues in voice gender discrimination by normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Qian-Jie Fu; Sherol Chinchilla; John J Galvin
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2004-05-20

8.  Psychophysical performance and Mandarin tone recognition in noise by cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Chaogang Wei; Keli Cao; Xin Jin; Xiaowei Chen; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Multichannel electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man. I. Basic psychophysics.

Authors:  R V Shannon
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Spectral and temporal cues to pitch in noise-excited vocoder simulations of continuous-interleaved-sampling cochlear implants.

Authors:  Tim Green; Andrew Faulkner; Stuart Rosen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  70 in total

1.  Comparing the effects of reverberation and of noise on speech recognition in simulated electric-acoustic listening.

Authors:  Kate Helms Tillery; Christopher A Brown; Sid P Bacon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Pitch contour identification with combined place and temporal cues using cochlear implants.

Authors:  Xin Luo; Monica Padilla; David M Landsberger
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Perception of speech produced by native and nonnative talkers by listeners with normal hearing and listeners with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Caili Ji; John J Galvin; Yi-ping Chang; Anting Xu; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 4.  Voice emotion perception and production in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  N T Jiam; M Caldwell; M L Deroche; M Chatterjee; C J Limb
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Effects of modulation wave shape on modulation frequency discrimination with electrical hearing.

Authors:  David M Landsberger
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Effects of envelope bandwidth on the intelligibility of sine- and noise-vocoded speech.

Authors:  Pamela Souza; Stuart Rosen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Cochlear-implant high pulse rate and narrow electrode configuration impair transmission of temporal information to the auditory cortex.

Authors:  John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-04-30       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  A mathematical model of vowel identification by users of cochlear implants.

Authors:  Elad Sagi; Ted A Meyer; Adam R Kaiser; Su Wooi Teoh; Mario A Svirsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Speech recognition and temporal amplitude modulation processing by Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Xin Luo; Qian-Jie Fu; Chao-Gang Wei; Ke-Li Cao
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Melodic pitch perception and lexical tone perception in Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Duoduo Tao; Rui Deng; Ye Jiang; John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu; Bing Chen
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.