Literature DB >> 12430827

Spectral and temporal cues to pitch in noise-excited vocoder simulations of continuous-interleaved-sampling cochlear implants.

Tim Green1, Andrew Faulkner, Stuart Rosen.   

Abstract

Four-band and single-band noise-excited vocoders were used in acoustic simulations to investigate spectral and temporal cues to melodic pitch in the output of a cochlear implant speech processor. Noise carriers were modulated by amplitude envelopes extracted by half-wave rectification and low-pass filtering at 32 or 400 Hz. The four-band, but not the single-band processors, may preserve spectral correlates of fundamental frequency (F0). Envelope smoothing at 400 Hz preserves temporal correlates of F0, which are eliminated with 32-Hz smoothing. Inputs to the processors were sawtooth frequency glides, in which spectral variation is completely determined by F0, or synthetic diphthongal vowel glides, whose spectral shape is dominated by varying formant resonances. Normal listeners labeled the direction of pitch movement of the processed stimuli. For processed sawtooth waves, purely temporal cues led to decreasing performance with increasing F0. With purely spectral cues, performance was above chance despite the limited spectral resolution of the processors. For processed diphthongs, performance with purely spectral cues was at chance, showing that spectral envelope changes due to formant movement obscured spectral cues to F0. Performance with temporal cues was poorer for diphthongs than for sawtooths, with very limited discrimination at higher F0. These data suggest that, for speech signals through a typical cochlear implant processor, spectral cues to pitch are likely to have limited utility, while temporal envelope cues may be useful only at low F0.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12430827     DOI: 10.1121/1.1506688

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  19 in total

1.  Talker-identification training using simulations of binaurally combined electric and acoustic hearing: generalization to speech and emotion recognition.

Authors:  Vidya Krull; Xin Luo; Karen Iler Kirk
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Fundamental frequency is critical to speech perception in noise in combined acoustic and electric hearing.

Authors:  Jeff Carroll; Stephanie Tiaden; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Processing F0 with cochlear implants: Modulation frequency discrimination and speech intonation recognition.

Authors:  Monita Chatterjee; Shu-Chen Peng
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-11-23       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Effects of envelope bandwidth on the intelligibility of sine- and noise-vocoded speech.

Authors:  Pamela Souza; Stuart Rosen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Lexical tone recognition with an artificial neural network.

Authors:  Ning Zhou; Wenle Zhang; Chao-Yang Lee; Li Xu
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  On Older Listeners' Ability to Perceive Dynamic Pitch.

Authors:  Jing Shen; Richard Wright; Pamela E Souza
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  The ability to glimpse dynamic pitch in noise by younger and older listeners.

Authors:  Jing Shen; Pamela E Souza
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Effects of age on F0 discrimination and intonation perception in simulated electric and electroacoustic hearing.

Authors:  Pamela Souza; Kathryn Arehart; Christi Wise Miller; Ramesh Kumar Muralimanohar
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Voice conversion in cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Eric P Wilkinson; Ossama Abdel-Hamid; John J Galvin; Hui Jiang; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 3.325

10.  Contribution of bimodal hearing to lexical tone normalization in Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Xin Luo; Yi-Ping Chang; Chun-Yi Lin; Ronald Y Chang
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.