Literature DB >> 12703715

Modulation masking in cochlear implant listeners: envelope versus tonotopic components.

Monita Chatterjee1.   

Abstract

It is hypothesized that channel-interaction in cochlear implant listeners as measured in a modulation-masking experiment would be influenced by both the tonotopic overlap between masker and signal as well as an interaction between their envelopes. Two experiments were conducted to measure the effects of maskers with noisy and steady-state envelopes on modulation detection by four adult Nucleus-22 cochlear implant listeners, as a function of tonotopic distance between the masker and the signal. In the first experiment, we measured detection thresholds for a 50-Hz modulation in the envelope of a 500-Hz carrier pulse train, in the presence of a masker stimulating regions basal and apical to, as well as overlapping with, the signal. The maskers had two kinds of envelopes: (i) amplitude-modulated by flat-spectrum noise (NAM) and (ii) steady-state (SS(peak)) at a level corresponding to the maximum of the noise fluctuation range. In general, modulation thresholds obtained in the presence of the NAM maskers significantly exceeded thresholds obtained with the corresponding SS(peak) maskers. The ratio p of the threshold modulation depth m obtained with the NAM masker to that obtained with the SS(peak) masker was defined as a conservative index of "envelope masking." In the second experiment, p was determined for two different tasks: the detection of modulation at 20 Hz and steady-state intensity increment detection. Compared to the 50-Hz modulation detection results, the ratio p was reduced for the 20-Hz modulation detection task and even more so for the steady-state increment detection task. It is concluded that channel-interaction can be significantly increased in cochlear implant listeners when dynamic stimuli are used in place of steady-state stimuli.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12703715     DOI: 10.1121/1.1555613

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  22 in total

1.  Using temporal modulation sensitivity to select stimulation sites for processor MAPs in cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Soha N Garadat; Teresa A Zwolan; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2013-07-20       Impact factor: 1.854

2.  Across- and within-channel envelope interactions in cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Monita Chatterjee; Sandra I Oba
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2004-12

3.  Effects of stimulation rate, mode and level on modulation detection by cochlear implant users.

Authors:  John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2005-09

4.  Processing F0 with cochlear implants: Modulation frequency discrimination and speech intonation recognition.

Authors:  Monita Chatterjee; Shu-Chen Peng
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-11-23       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Across-site patterns of modulation detection: relation to speech recognition.

Authors:  Soha N Garadat; Teresa A Zwolan; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Psychophysically based site selection coupled with dichotic stimulation improves speech recognition in noise with bilateral cochlear implants.

Authors:  Ning Zhou; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Acoustic temporal modulation detection and speech perception in cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Jong Ho Won; Ward R Drennan; Kaibao Nie; Elyse M Jameyson; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Binaural unmasking of multi-channel stimuli in bilateral cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Lieselot Van Deun; Astrid van Wieringen; Tom Francart; Andreas Büchner; Thomas Lenarz; Jan Wouters
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-06-09

9.  Detection and rate discrimination of amplitude modulation in electrical hearing.

Authors:  Monita Chatterjee; Cherish Oberzut
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 10.  Trends in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2004
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.