Literature DB >> 18087946

Implicit memory influences the allocation of attention in visual cortex.

Jeffrey S Johnson1, Geoffrey F Woodman, Elsie Braun, Steven J Luck.   

Abstract

The visual environment is highly regular, with particular objects frequently appearing in specific locations. Previous studies of visual search have shown that people take advantage of such regularities, detecting targets more quickly when they appear at a predictable location within a given spatial configuration. Moreover, this effect depends on implicit rather than explicit memory for the configurations. These studies have suggested that implicit long-term memory for contextual information influences the allocation of attention, modulating the flow of information through visual cortex. The present study used event-related potentials to provide the first direct support for this proposal. We suggest that this guidance of attention by implicit memory is important in the natural environment because it allows environmental regularities to influence perception without the intervention of limited-capacity conscious processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18087946     DOI: 10.3758/bf03194108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  20 in total

1.  Implicit, long-term spatial contextual memory.

Authors:  Marvin M Chun; Yuhong Jiang
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  The neural site of attention matches the spatial scale of perception.

Authors:  Jens-Max Hopf; Steven J Luck; Kai Boelmans; Mircea A Schoenfeld; Carsten N Boehler; Jochem Rieger; Hans-Jochen Heinze
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Visual search remains efficient when visual working memory is full.

Authors:  G F Woodman; E K Vogel; S J Luck
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2001-05

4.  Contextual cueing: implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention.

Authors:  M M Chun; Y Jiang
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Jackknife-based method for measuring LRP onset latency differences.

Authors:  J Miller; T Patterson; R Ulrich
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.016

6.  Bridging the gap between monkey neurophysiology and human perception: an ambiguity resolution theory of visual selective attention.

Authors:  S J Luck; M Girelli; M T McDermott; M A Ford
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Graded capacity-sharing in dual-task interference?

Authors:  H Pashler
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Electrophysiological correlates of feature analysis during visual search.

Authors:  S J Luck; S A Hillyard
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 4.016

9.  Neural sources of focused attention in visual search.

Authors:  J M Hopf; S J Luck; M Girelli; T Hagner; G R Mangun; H Scheich; H J Heinze
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  Memory deficits for implicit contextual information in amnesic subjects with hippocampal damage.

Authors:  M M Chun; E A Phelps
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  18 in total

1.  EEG signatures of contextual influences on visual search with real scenes.

Authors:  Amir H Meghdadi; Barry Giesbrecht; Miguel P Eckstein
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The time course of attentional deployment in contextual cueing.

Authors:  Yuhong V Jiang; Heather M Sigstad; Khena M Swallow
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-04

3.  Long-term memories bias sensitivity and target selection in complex scenes.

Authors:  Eva Zita Patai; Sonia Doallo; Anna Christina Nobre
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Target absent trials in configural contextual cuing.

Authors:  Melina A Kunar; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Both memory and attention systems contribute to visual search for targets cued by implicitly learned context.

Authors:  Barry Giesbrecht; Jocelyn L Sy; Scott A Guerin
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Contextual cost: when a visual-search target is not where it should be.

Authors:  Tal Makovski; Yuhong V Jiang
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.143

7.  Conscious and unconscious memory differentially impact attention: Eye movements, visual search, and recognition processes.

Authors:  Michelle M Ramey; Andrew P Yonelinas; John M Henderson
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2019-01-18

8.  ERPs recorded during early second language exposure predict syntactic learning.

Authors:  Laura Batterink; Helen J Neville
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Sleep-effects on implicit and explicit memory in repeated visual search.

Authors:  Thomas Geyer; Hermann J Mueller; Leonardo Assumpcao; Steffen Gais
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Rewarding distractor context versus rewarding target location: a commentary on Tseng and Lleras (2013).

Authors:  Bernhard Schlagbauer; Thomas Geyer; Hermann J Müller; Michael Zehetleitner
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.