Literature DB >> 9212722

Bridging the gap between monkey neurophysiology and human perception: an ambiguity resolution theory of visual selective attention.

S J Luck1, M Girelli, M T McDermott, M A Ford.   

Abstract

When the visual system must process multiple objects simultaneously, as in the visual search paradigm, the neural coding of individual objects can become ambiguous due to the visual system's extensive use of coarse coding and distributed representations. Here we propose that the primary role of visual selective attention within the ventral object recognition pathway is to resolve these ambiguities. We begin by reviewing previous studies of the effects of attention on neural responses in monkeys, which provide the basis for this hypothesis, and then describe a new set of experiments showing that similar attentional mechanisms operate in the human brain. In these new experiments, event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded from normal human observers while they performed tasks analogous to those used previously in monkeys. The central finding was that an attention-related ERP wave called the "N2pc component" was present under the same conditions that led to attentional modulations of neural responses in monkey visual cortex. These human electrophysiological results provide a bridge between cognitive-level theories of visual attention and the behavior of individual neurons in visual cortex.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9212722     DOI: 10.1006/cogp.1997.0660

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Psychol        ISSN: 0010-0285            Impact factor:   3.468


  112 in total

Review 1.  Direct and indirect integration of event-related potentials, functional magnetic resonance images, and single-unit recordings.

Authors:  S J Luck
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  The role of magnocellular signals in oculomotor attentional capture.

Authors:  Carly J Leonard; Steven J Luck
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Attentional capture modulates perceptual sensitivity.

Authors:  Jan Theeuwes; Arthur F Kramer; Alan Kingstone
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-06

4.  Reward breaks through center-surround inhibition via anterior insula.

Authors:  Lihui Wang; Hongbo Yu; Jie Hu; Jan Theeuwes; Xiaoliang Gong; Yang Xiang; Changjun Jiang; Xiaolin Zhou
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  The head of the table: marking the "front" of an object is tightly linked with selection.

Authors:  Yangqing Xu; Steven L Franconeri
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  On the control of visual spatial attention: evidence from human electrophysiology.

Authors:  Pierre Jolicoeur; Paola Sessa; Roberto Dell'Acqua; Nicolas Robitaille
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-09-24

7.  Moving to higher ground: The dynamic field theory and the dynamics of visual cognition.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Johnson; John P Spencer; Gregor Schöner
Journal:  New Ideas Psychol       Date:  2008-08

8.  Mind-wandering Is Accompanied by Both Local Sleep and Enhanced Processes of Spatial Attention Allocation.

Authors:  Christian Wienke; Mandy V Bartsch; Lena Vogelgesang; Christoph Reichert; Hermann Hinrichs; Hans-Jochen Heinze; Stefan Dürschmid
Journal:  Cereb Cortex Commun       Date:  2021-01-15

Review 9.  CNTRICS final task selection: control of attention.

Authors:  Keith H Nuechterlein; Steven J Luck; Cindy Lustig; Martin Sarter
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 9.306

10.  Both memory and attention systems contribute to visual search for targets cued by implicitly learned context.

Authors:  Barry Giesbrecht; Jocelyn L Sy; Scott A Guerin
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 1.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.