Literature DB >> 24666165

ERPs recorded during early second language exposure predict syntactic learning.

Laura Batterink1, Helen J Neville.   

Abstract

Millions of adults worldwide are faced with the task of learning a second language (L2). Understanding the neural mechanisms that support this learning process is an important area of scientific inquiry. However, most previous studies on the neural mechanisms underlying L2 acquisition have focused on characterizing the results of learning, relying upon end-state outcome measures in which learning is assessed after it has occurred, rather than on the learning process itself. In this study, we adopted a novel and more direct approach to investigate neural mechanisms engaged during L2 learning, in which we recorded ERPs from beginning adult learners as they were exposed to an unfamiliar L2 for the first time. Learners' proficiency in the L2 was then assessed behaviorally using a grammaticality judgment task, and ERP data acquired during initial L2 exposure were sorted as a function of performance on this task. High-proficiency learners showed a larger N100 effect to open-class content words compared with closed-class function words, whereas low-proficiency learners did not show a significant N100 difference between open- and closed-class words. In contrast, amplitude of the N400 word category effect correlated with learners' L2 comprehension, rather than predicting syntactic learning. Taken together, these results indicate that learners who spontaneously direct greater attention to open- rather than closed-class words when processing L2 input show better syntactic learning, suggesting a link between selective attention to open-class content words and acquisition of basic morphosyntactic rules. These findings highlight the importance of selective attention mechanisms for L2 acquisition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24666165      PMCID: PMC4334461          DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00618

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  62 in total

1.  Perceptual priming versus explicit memory: dissociable neural correlates at encoding.

Authors:  Björn Schott; Alan Richardson-Klavehn; Hans-Jochen Heinze; Emrah Düzel
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2002-05-15       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Orienting attention to points in time improves stimulus processing both within and across modalities.

Authors:  Kathrin Lange; Brigitte Röder
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Implicit memory influences the allocation of attention in visual cortex.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Johnson; Geoffrey F Woodman; Elsie Braun; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-10

4.  Time course and functional neuroanatomy of speech segmentation in adults.

Authors:  Toni Cunillera; Estela Càmara; Juan M Toro; Josep Marco-Pallares; Nuria Sebastián-Galles; Hector Ortiz; Jesús Pujol; Antoni Rodríguez-Fornells
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-07-04       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Temporally selective attention modulates early perceptual processing: event-related potential evidence.

Authors:  Lisa D Sanders; Lori B Astheimer
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2008-05

6.  An event-related potential study on changes of violation and error responses during morphosyntactic learning.

Authors:  Douglas J Davidson; Peter Indefrey
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Neural correlates of encoding in an incidental learning paradigm.

Authors:  K A Paller; M Kutas; A R Mayes
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1987-10

8.  Electrical signs of selective attention in the human brain.

Authors:  S A Hillyard; R F Hink; V L Schwent; T W Picton
Journal:  Science       Date:  1973-10-12       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Endogenous brain potentials associated with selective auditory attention.

Authors:  J C Hansen; S A Hillyard
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1980-08

10.  Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity.

Authors:  M Kutas; S A Hillyard
Journal:  Science       Date:  1980-01-11       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  3 in total

1.  Word meaning acquisition is reflected in brain potentials of isolated words.

Authors:  Jan Rouke Kuipers; Anastasia Uminski; Zoe Green; David Hughes; Tommaso Aglietti
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  EEG Resting-State and Event-Related Potentials as Markers of Learning Success in Older Adults Following Second Language Training: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Maria Kliesch; Nathalie Giroud; Martin Meyer
Journal:  Brain Plast       Date:  2021-10-19

3.  Prediction of Second Language Proficiency Based on Electroencephalographic Signals Measured While Listening to Natural Speech.

Authors:  Aya S Ihara; Atsushi Matsumoto; Shiro Ojima; Jun'ichi Katayama; Keita Nakamura; Yusuke Yokota; Hiroki Watanabe; Yasushi Naruse
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 3.169

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.