Literature DB >> 30665071

Conscious and unconscious memory differentially impact attention: Eye movements, visual search, and recognition processes.

Michelle M Ramey1, Andrew P Yonelinas2, John M Henderson3.   

Abstract

A hotly debated question is whether memory influences attention through conscious or unconscious processes. To address this controversy, we measured eye movements while participants searched repeated real-world scenes for embedded targets, and we assessed memory for each scene using confidence-based methods to isolate different states of subjective memory awareness. We found that memory-informed eye movements during visual search were predicted both by conscious recollection, which led to a highly precise first eye movement toward the remembered location, and by unconscious memory, which increased search efficiency by gradually directing the eyes toward the target throughout the search trial. In contrast, these eye movement measures were not influenced by familiarity-based memory (i.e., changes in subjective reports of memory strength). The results indicate that conscious recollection and unconscious memory can each play distinct and complementary roles in guiding attention to facilitate efficient extraction of visual information.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Contextual cueing; Eyetracking; Implicit memory; Memory; Recognition; Visual search

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30665071      PMCID: PMC6944193          DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.01.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  39 in total

1.  Eye-movement-based memory effect: a reprocessing effect in face perception.

Authors:  R R Althoff; N J Cohen
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Perceptual learning, awareness, and the hippocampus.

Authors:  J R Manns; L R Squire
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.899

3.  Attentional guidance of the eyes by contextual information and abrupt onsets.

Authors:  M S Peterson; A F Kramer
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-10

4.  Scene memory is more detailed than you think: the role of categories in visual long-term memory.

Authors:  Talia Konkle; Timothy F Brady; George A Alvarez; Aude Oliva
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2010-10-04

5.  Eye movements and visual memory: detecting changes to saccade targets in scenes.

Authors:  John M Henderson; Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2003-01

6.  Recognition memory strength is predicted by pupillary responses at encoding while fixation patterns distinguish recollection from familiarity.

Authors:  Alexandros Kafkas; Daniela Montaldi
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2011-08-15       Impact factor: 2.143

7.  Contextual cueing: implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention.

Authors:  M M Chun; Y Jiang
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Use of eye movement monitoring to examine item and relational memory in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Deborah E Hannula; Charan Ranganath; Ian S Ramsay; Marjorie Solomon; Jong Yoon; Tara A Niendam; Cameron S Carter; John D Ragland
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2010-07-31       Impact factor: 13.382

9.  Worth a glance: using eye movements to investigate the cognitive neuroscience of memory.

Authors:  Deborah E Hannula; Robert R Althoff; David E Warren; Lily Riggs; Neal J Cohen; Jennifer D Ryan
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Eye movements predict recollective experience.

Authors:  Tali Sharot; Matthew L Davidson; Meredith M Carson; Elizabeth A Phelps
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-08-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  8 in total

1.  Mild acute stress improves response speed without impairing accuracy or interference control in two selective attention tasks: Implications for theories of stress and cognition.

Authors:  Grant S Shields; Andrew M Rivers; Michelle M Ramey; Brian C Trainor; Andrew P Yonelinas
Journal:  Psychoneuroendocrinology       Date:  2019-06-08       Impact factor: 4.905

2.  The spatial distribution of attention predicts familiarity strength during encoding and retrieval.

Authors:  Michelle M Ramey; John M Henderson; Andrew P Yonelinas
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2020-04-06

3.  The subconscious impact of line orientations in background images on memory of Chinese written characters.

Authors:  Yanqun Huang; Yi Zhang; Xu Li; Jie Zhang; Yuzhen Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 3.752

4.  Driver's Visual Attention Characteristics and Their Emotional Influencing Mechanism under Different Cognitive Tasks.

Authors:  Yaqi Liu; Xiaoyuan Wang; Longfei Chen; Shijie Liu; Junyan Han; Huili Shi; Fusheng Zhong
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 4.614

5.  Temporal context guides visual exploration during scene recognition.

Authors:  James E Kragel; Joel L Voss
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2020-09-24

6.  Why do we retrace our visual steps? Semantic and episodic memory in gaze reinstatement.

Authors:  Michelle M Ramey; Andrew P Yonelinas; John M Henderson
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 2.460

7.  Eye Movements in Real-World Scene Photographs: General Characteristics and Effects of Viewing Task.

Authors:  Deborah A Cronin; Elizabeth H Hall; Jessica E Goold; Taylor R Hayes; John M Henderson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-01-14

8.  Gender moderates the association between chronic academic stress with top-down and bottom-up attention.

Authors:  Bradley J Wright; Kira-Elise Wilson; Michael Kingsley; Paul Maruff; Jian Li; Johannes Siegrist; Ben Horan
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 2.199

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.