Literature DB >> 23099047

Both memory and attention systems contribute to visual search for targets cued by implicitly learned context.

Barry Giesbrecht1, Jocelyn L Sy, Scott A Guerin.   

Abstract

Environmental context learned without awareness can facilitate visual processing of goal-relevant information. According to one view, the benefit of implicitly learned context relies on the neural systems involved in spatial attention and hippocampus-mediated memory. While this view has received empirical support, it contradicts traditional models of hippocampal function. The purpose of the present work was to clarify the influence of spatial context on visual search performance and on brain structures involved memory and attention. Event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging revealed that activity in the hippocampus as well as in visual and parietal cortex was modulated by learned visual context even though participants' subjective reports and performance on a post-experiment recognition task indicated no explicit knowledge of the learned context. Moreover, the magnitude of the initial selective hippocampus response predicted the magnitude of the behavioral benefit due to context observed at the end of the experiment. The results suggest that implicit contextual learning is mediated by attention and memory and that these systems interact to support search of our environment.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23099047      PMCID: PMC3578045          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2012.10.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  77 in total

1.  Electrophysiological measurement of rapid shifts of attention during visual search.

Authors:  G F Woodman; S J Luck
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-08-26       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  The neural mechanisms of top-down attentional control.

Authors:  J B Hopfinger; M H Buonocore; G R Mangun
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Associative knowledge controls deployment of visual selective attention.

Authors:  Elisabeth Moores; Liana Laiti; Leonardo Chelazzi
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Functional organization of human intraparietal and frontal cortex for attending, looking, and pointing.

Authors:  Serguei V Astafiev; Gordon L Shulman; Christine M Stanley; Abraham Z Snyder; David C Van Essen; Maurizio Corbetta
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Neural mechanisms of top-down control during spatial and feature attention.

Authors:  B Giesbrecht; M G Woldorff; A W Song; G R Mangun
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Voluntary orienting is dissociated from target detection in human posterior parietal cortex.

Authors:  M Corbetta; J M Kincade; J M Ollinger; M P McAvoy; G L Shulman
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 24.884

7.  Implicit memory influences the allocation of attention in visual cortex.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Johnson; Geoffrey F Woodman; Elsie Braun; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-10

8.  Puzzlingly High Correlations in fMRI Studies of Emotion, Personality, and Social Cognition.

Authors:  Edward Vul; Christine Harris; Piotr Winkielman; Harold Pashler
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2009-05

9.  Neural sources of focused attention in visual search.

Authors:  J M Hopf; S J Luck; M Girelli; T Hagner; G R Mangun; H Scheich; H J Heinze
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  Cortical analysis of visual context.

Authors:  Moshe Bar; Elissa Aminoff
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2003-04-24       Impact factor: 17.173

View more
  21 in total

1.  The attentional template is shifted and asymmetrically sharpened by distractor context.

Authors:  Xinger Yu; Joy J Geng
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  EEG signatures of contextual influences on visual search with real scenes.

Authors:  Amir H Meghdadi; Barry Giesbrecht; Miguel P Eckstein
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Gradual acquisition of visuospatial associative memory representations via the dorsal precuneus.

Authors:  Björn H Schott; Torsten Wüstenberg; Eva Lücke; Ina-Maria Pohl; Anni Richter; Constanze I Seidenbecher; Stefan Pollmann; Jasmin M Kizilirmak; Alan Richardson-Klavehn
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  The neural basis of implicit learning of task-irrelevant Chinese tonal sequence.

Authors:  Xiaoli Ling; Xiuyan Guo; Li Zheng; Lin Li; Menghe Chen; Qianfeng Wang; Qihao Huang; Zoltan Dienes
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Hippocampal and Prefrontal Theta-Band Mechanisms Underpin Implicit Spatial Context Learning.

Authors:  Eelke Spaak; Floris P de Lange
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Hippocampal contribution to implicit configuration memory expressed via eye movements during scene exploration.

Authors:  Anthony J Ryals; Jane X Wang; Kelly L Polnaszek; Joel L Voss
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 3.899

7.  Attentional modulation: target selection, active search and cognitive processing.

Authors:  Marisa Carrasco; Miguel Eckstein; Rich Krauzlis; Preeti Verghese
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Neural Signatures of Spatial Statistical Learning: Characterizing the Extraction of Structure from Complex Visual Scenes.

Authors:  Elisabeth A Karuza; Lauren L Emberson; Matthew E Roser; Daniel Cole; Richard N Aslin; Jozsef Fiser
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Memory-Guided Attention: Independent Contributions of the Hippocampus and Striatum.

Authors:  Elizabeth V Goldfarb; Marvin M Chun; Elizabeth A Phelps
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Sleep Strengthens Predictive Sequence Coding.

Authors:  Nicolas D Lutz; Ines Wolf; Stefanie Hübner; Jan Born; Karsten Rauss
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.