Literature DB >> 16571761

The neural site of attention matches the spatial scale of perception.

Jens-Max Hopf1, Steven J Luck, Kai Boelmans, Mircea A Schoenfeld, Carsten N Boehler, Jochem Rieger, Hans-Jochen Heinze.   

Abstract

What is the neural locus of visual attention? Here we show that the locus is not fixed but instead changes rapidly to match the spatial scale of task-relevant information in the current scene. To accomplish this, we obtained electrical, magnetic, and hemodynamic measures of attention from human subjects while they detected large-scale or small-scale targets within multiscale stimulus patterns. Subjects did not know the scale of the target before stimulus onset, and yet the neural locus of attention-related activity between 250 and 300 ms varied according to the scale of the target. Specifically, maximal attention-related activity spread from a high-level, relatively anterior visual area (the lateral occipital complex) for large-scale targets to include a lower-level, more posterior area (visual area V4) for small-scale targets. This rapid change indicates that the neural locus of attention in visual cortex is not static but is instead determined rapidly and dynamically by means of an interaction between top-down task information and local information about the current visual input.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16571761      PMCID: PMC6673866          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4510-05.2006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  48 in total

1.  Manipulation of orthogonal neural systems together in electrophysiological recordings: the MONSTER approach to simultaneous assessment of multiple neurocognitive dimensions.

Authors:  Emily S Kappenman; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 9.306

2.  How the speed of motor-response decisions, but not focal-attentional selection, differs as a function of task set and target prevalence.

Authors:  Thomas Töllner; Dragan Rangelov; Hermann J Müller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-06-25       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Foveal Processing Under Concurrent Peripheral Load in Profoundly Deaf Adults.

Authors:  Matthew W G Dye
Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ       Date:  2015-12-10

4.  Which aspects of visual attention are changed by deafness? The case of the Attentional Network Test.

Authors:  Matthew W G Dye; Dara E Baril; Daphne Bavelier
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2007-01-10       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Implicit memory influences the allocation of attention in visual cortex.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Johnson; Geoffrey F Woodman; Elsie Braun; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-10

6.  The spatial scale of attention strongly modulates saccade latencies.

Authors:  Mark R Harwood; Laurent Madelain; Richard J Krauzlis; Josh Wallman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 7.  Influence of cognitive control and mismatch on the N2 component of the ERP: a review.

Authors:  Jonathan R Folstein; Cyma Van Petten
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2007-09-10       Impact factor: 4.016

8.  Attentional modulation of visual responses by flexible input gain.

Authors:  Geoffrey M Ghose
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-02-04       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 9.  How neuroscience can inform the study of individual differences in cognitive abilities.

Authors:  Dennis J McFarland
Journal:  Rev Neurosci       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 4.353

Review 10.  Aberrant Modulation of Brain Oscillatory Activity and Attentional Impairment in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.

Authors:  Agatha Lenartowicz; Ali Mazaheri; Ole Jensen; Sandra K Loo
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging       Date:  2017-10-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.