Literature DB >> 18056857

Radiation dose to organs and tissues from mammography: Monte Carlo and phantom study.

Ioannis Sechopoulos1, Sankararaman Suryanarayanan, Srinivasan Vedantham, Carl J D'Orsi, Andrew Karellas.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To prospectively determine the radiation dose to the organs of the body during standard bilateral two-view mammography by using Monte Carlo simulations and a phantom.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A modified version of the Cristy mathematic anthropomorphic phantom was implemented in the Geant4 Monte Carlo tool kit to simulate the conditions present in screen-film and digital mammography. The breast was simulated with compression in both the craniocaudal and the mediolateral oblique views. X-rays were tracked from the source until their absorption in the body or in the detector or their exit from the simulation limits, with recording of all the intermediate interactions in the body. The simulation was performed with x-rays of energy ranging from 6 to 35 keV to obtain results for clinically relevant spectra. The ratio of dose to an organ in the body per unit glandular dose to the breast, denoted the relative organ dose (ROD), was computed. The effect of using a body protective shield was also investigated.
RESULTS: The organs that received an ROD of 0.10% or higher in at least one view and one spectrum were the contralateral breast, ipsilateral eye and eye lens, heart, ipsilateral lung, and thymus. Among the organs, the maximum ROD was 0.62%. The maximum ROD for the bone surfaces was 2.36% and that for the red bone marrow was 0.56%. The highest ROD measured for the uterus or fetus at the first trimester was less than 10(-5).
CONCLUSION: The radiation dose to all tissues other than the breast is extremely low. The dose to the first-trimester fetus is minimal. (c) RSNA, 2007.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18056857      PMCID: PMC2430752          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2462070256

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  27 in total

1.  Glandular breast dose for monoenergetic and high-energy X-ray beams: Monte Carlo assessment.

Authors:  J M Boone
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Dosimetric considerations in mammography.

Authors:  K A Hatziioannou; K Psarrakos; E Molyvda-Athanasopoulou; G Kitis; E Papanastassiou; I Sofroniadis; O Kimoundri
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Lung cancer screening.

Authors:  Annette McWilliams; Stephen Lam
Journal:  Curr Opin Pulm Med       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.155

4.  CT dosimetry: getting the best from the adult Cristy phantom.

Authors:  I A Castellano; D R Dance; P M Evans
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 0.972

5.  Computation of the glandular radiation dose in digital tomosynthesis of the breast.

Authors:  Ioannis Sechopoulos; Sankararaman Suryanarayanan; Srinivasan Vedantham; Carl D'Orsi; Andrew Karellas
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  An assessment of bone marrow and bone endosteum dosimetry methods for photon sources.

Authors:  Choonik Lee; Choonsik Lee; Amish P Shah; Wesley E Bolch
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-10-06       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Scatter radiation in digital tomosynthesis of the breast.

Authors:  Ioannis Sechopoulos; Sankararaman Suryanarayanan; Srinivasan Vedantham; Carl J D'Orsi; Andrew Karellas
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Mammography and fetal dose.

Authors:  Richard H Behrman; Marc J Homer; Wei Tse Yang; Gary J Whitman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  All about FAX: a Female Adult voXel phantom for Monte Carlo calculation in radiation protection dosimetry.

Authors:  R Kramer; H J Khoury; J W Vieira; E C M Loureiro; V J M Lima; F R A Lima; G Hoff
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2004-12-07       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Effective doses to patients undergoing thoracic computed tomography examinations.

Authors:  W Huda; E M Scalzetti; M Roskopf
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  10 in total

1.  Monte Carlo and phantom study of the radiation dose to the body from dedicated CT of the breast.

Authors:  Ioannis Sechopoulos; Srinivasan Vedantham; Sankararaman Suryanarayanan; Carl J D'Orsi; Andrew Karellas
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 2.  Breast cancer imaging: a perspective for the next decade.

Authors:  Andrew Karellas; Srinivasan Vedantham
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 3.  "Doctor, will that x-ray harm my unborn child?".

Authors:  Savithiri Ratnapalan; Yedidia Bentur; Gideon Koren
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2008-12-02       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 4.  Radiological staging in pregnant patients with cancer.

Authors:  Ramona Woitek; Daniela Prayer; Azadeh Hojreh; Thomas Helbich
Journal:  ESMO Open       Date:  2016-02-08

5.  Effect of thyroid shielding during mammography: measurements on phantom and patient as well as estimation with Monte Carlo simulation.

Authors:  Miriam Pyka; Patrik Eschle; Christian Sommer; Mathias S Weyland; Rahel Kubik; Stephan Scheidegger
Journal:  Eur Radiol Exp       Date:  2018-06-28

6.  Breast biopsy navigation system with an assisted needle holder tool and 2D graphical user interface.

Authors:  Jackrit Suthakorn; Narucha Tanaiutchawoot; Cholatip Wiratkapan; Songpol Ongwattanakul
Journal:  Eur J Radiol Open       Date:  2018-07-18

Review 7.  Triple Negative Breast Cancer: A Review of Present and Future Diagnostic Modalities.

Authors:  Sylvia Annabel Dass; Kim Liu Tan; Rehasri Selva Rajan; Noor Fatmawati Mokhtar; Elis Rosliza Mohd Adzmi; Wan Faiziah Wan Abdul Rahman; Tengku Ahmad Damitri Al-Astani Tengku Din; Venugopal Balakrishnan
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 2.430

8.  Breast cancer detection by analyzing the volatile organic compound (VOC) signature in human urine.

Authors:  Judit Giró Benet; Minjun Seo; Michelle Khine; Josep Gumà Padró; Antonio Pardo Martnez; Fadi Kurdahi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 4.996

9.  Electron Beam Intraoperative Radiotherapy (ELIOT) in Pregnant Women with Breast Cancer: From in Vivo Dosimetry to Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Maria Leonardi; Agnese Cecconi; Rosa Luraschi; Elena Rondi; Federica Cattani; Roberta Lazzari; Anna Morra; Santos Soto; Vanna Zanagnolo; Viviana Galimberti; Oreste Gentilini; Fedro Peccatori; Barbara Jereczek-Fossa; Roberto Orecchia
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 2.860

10.  Reduction of the fluorine-18-labeled fluorodeoxyglucose dose for clinically dedicated breast positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Yoko Satoh; Tetsuro Sekine; Yoshie Omiya; Hiroshi Onishi; Utaroh Motosugi
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2019-11-29
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.