Literature DB >> 17047259

An assessment of bone marrow and bone endosteum dosimetry methods for photon sources.

Choonik Lee1, Choonsik Lee, Amish P Shah, Wesley E Bolch.   

Abstract

The rather complex and microscopic histological structure of the skeletal system generally limits one's ability to accurately model this tissue during dosimetric evaluations. Consequently, various assumptions must be made to evaluate the absorbed dose from external and internal photons to the radiosensitive tissues of the red (or haematopoietically active) bone marrow and the osteogenic tissues of the skeletal endosteum. These various methods for photon skeletal dosimetry have not been inter-compared, partly due to the lack of a realistic reference model that can provide a high-resolution three-dimensional geometry for secondary electron particle transport. In the present study, the paired-image radiation transport (PIRT) model developed by Shah et al (2005 J. Nucl. Med. 45 344) was utilized to evaluate the absorbed dose per incident photon fluence to these skeletal regions from idealized parallel beams of monoenergetic photons. The PIRT model results were then used as a local reference against which absorbed doses via other methods were compared. For red bone marrow dosimetry, four approximate techniques were considered: (1) the dose response function method (DRF method) presented in ORNL/TM-8381, (2) the mass-energy absorption coefficient ratio method (two-parameter MEAC method), (3) the MEAC method with the additional use of energy-dependent dose enhancement factors from King and Spiers (1985 Br. J. Radiol. 58 345) (three-parameter MEAC method), and (4) the three-parameter MEAC method applied at the voxel level through the use image-specific CT numbers (CTN method). For the bone endosteum (i.e., bone surfaces), two approximate techniques were compared: (1) the DRF method for bone surfaces and (2) the homogeneous bone approximation (HBA) method. In each case, the local reference standard was assumed to be that of the PIRT model. Four different ex vivo bone specimens with distinctively different internal structures were used in the study: the cranium, the lumbar vertebra, the os coxae and the left middle rib, each excised from a 66 year male cadaver (body mass index, 22.7 kg m(-2)). High-resolution CT images of these skeletal sites were used to construct computational voxel models for Monte Carlo radiation transport. Study results indicated that skeletal sites with thick cortical regions and thick trabeculae such as in the cranium provide considerable beam attenuation at low photon energies, which is not properly accounted for in methods based on a homogeneous skeletal tissue structure (DRF, MEAC, HBA). For bone marrow dose assessment, the CTN method showed the best agreement with PIRT model results over a broad range of photon energies, while the HBA method showed better agreement with the PIRT model in assessing bone endosteum dose at energies above 100 keV. Bone surface doses were better approximately by the DRF method at energies below 50 keV. Considerable secondary electron escape at photon energies over 1-3 MeV were accounted for in RBM dose assessment only in the PIRT model, as the other methods presume either an infinite expanse of spongiosa (DRF) or the existence of charge-particle equilibrium (MEAC, CTN).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17047259     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/51/21/001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  22 in total

1.  The feasibility of a scanner-independent technique to estimate organ dose from MDCT scans: using CTDIvol to account for differences between scanners.

Authors:  Adam C Turner; Maria Zankl; John J DeMarco; Chris H Cagnon; Di Zhang; Erin Angel; Dianna D Cody; Donna M Stevens; Cynthia H McCollough; Michael F McNitt-Gray
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Response functions for computing absorbed dose to skeletal tissues from photon irradiation--an update.

Authors:  Perry B Johnson; Amir A Bahadori; Keith F Eckerman; Choonsik Lee; Wesley E Bolch
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Radiation dose to organs and tissues from mammography: Monte Carlo and phantom study.

Authors:  Ioannis Sechopoulos; Sankararaman Suryanarayanan; Srinivasan Vedantham; Carl J D'Orsi; Andrew Karellas
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-12-04       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Monte Carlo and phantom study of the radiation dose to the body from dedicated CT of the breast.

Authors:  Ioannis Sechopoulos; Srinivasan Vedantham; Sankararaman Suryanarayanan; Carl J D'Orsi; Andrew Karellas
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  The impact on CT dose of the variability in tube current modulation technology: a theoretical investigation.

Authors:  Xiang Li; W Paul Segars; Ehsan Samei
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-07-28       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Development of a paediatric head voxel model database for dosimetric applications.

Authors:  Andreas Stratis; Nathan Touyz; Guozhi Zhang; Reinhilde Jacobs; Ria Bogaerts; Hilde Bosmans
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Dosimetry of a cone beam CT device for oral and maxillofacial radiology using Monte Carlo techniques and ICRP adult reference computational phantoms.

Authors:  J J Morant; M Salvadó; I Hernández-Girón; R Casanovas; R Ortega; A Calzado
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 2.419

8.  Patient-specific radiation dose and cancer risk estimation in CT: part II. Application to patients.

Authors:  Xiang Li; Ehsan Samei; W Paul Segars; Gregory M Sturgeon; James G Colsher; Greta Toncheva; Terry T Yoshizumi; Donald P Frush
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  PATIENT-SPECIFIC DOSE ESTIMATES IN DYNAMIC COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION EXAMINATION.

Authors:  V-M Sundell; M Kortesniemi; T Siiskonen; A Kosunen; S Rosendahl; L Büermann
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 0.972

10.  RPI-AM and RPI-AF, a pair of mesh-based, size-adjustable adult male and female computational phantoms using ICRP-89 parameters and their calculations for organ doses from monoenergetic photon beams.

Authors:  Juying Zhang; Yong Hum Na; Peter F Caracappa; X George Xu
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-09-17       Impact factor: 3.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.