Literature DB >> 15928490

Lung cancer screening.

Annette McWilliams1, Stephen Lam.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Advances in imaging technologies and biomarker research offer hope that the incidence and mortality of lung cancer can be reduced by screening similar to what have been achieved for cancer of the cervix, breast, and colon. RECENT
FINDINGS: Spiral computed tomography with multitrack scanners and autofluorescence bronchoscopy offer unprecedented sensitivity to detect lung cancer even during the preinvasive stage. The high sensitivity of these tests, however, is associated with a low specificity. Better selection of individuals at highest risk of lung cancer using biomarkers in sputum, blood, or exhaled breath, as well as a better understanding of genetic susceptibility, may improve their positive predictive values, minimize unnecessary downstream investigations or treatment, as well as reduce screening costs.
SUMMARY: Improvement in the performance of sputum, exhaled breath, or blood biomarkers holds promise as the first screening step to identify individuals at highest risk of lung cancer beyond what age and smoking could predict to select those who would obtain the most benefits from spiral computed tomography or autofluorescence bronchoscopy as localization tools.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15928490     DOI: 10.1097/01.mcp.0000166592.10666.d1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Pulm Med        ISSN: 1070-5287            Impact factor:   3.155


  5 in total

1.  Radiation dose to organs and tissues from mammography: Monte Carlo and phantom study.

Authors:  Ioannis Sechopoulos; Sankararaman Suryanarayanan; Srinivasan Vedantham; Carl J D'Orsi; Andrew Karellas
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-12-04       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Monte Carlo and phantom study of the radiation dose to the body from dedicated CT of the breast.

Authors:  Ioannis Sechopoulos; Srinivasan Vedantham; Sankararaman Suryanarayanan; Carl J D'Orsi; Andrew Karellas
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 3.  Lung cancer screening: review and performance comparison under different risk scenarios.

Authors:  Joseph E Tota; Agnihotram V Ramanakumar; Eduardo L Franco
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 2.584

4.  A multi-analyte serum test for the detection of non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  E C Farlow; M S Vercillo; J S Coon; S Basu; A W Kim; L P Faber; W H Warren; P Bonomi; M J Liptay; J A Borgia
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-09-21       Impact factor: 7.640

5.  Multiple marker detection in peripheral blood for NSCLC diagnosis.

Authors:  Paola Ulivi; Laura Mercatali; Gian-Luca Casoni; Emanuela Scarpi; Lauro Bucchi; Rosella Silvestrini; Stefano Sanna; Marco Monteverde; Dino Amadori; Venerino Poletti; Wainer Zoli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.