Literature DB >> 17927427

Low-frequency and high-frequency cochlear nonlinearity in humans.

Michael P Gorga1, Stephen T Neely, Darcia M Dierking, Judy Kopun, Kristin Jolkowski, Kristin Groenenboom, Hongyang Tan, Bettina Stiegemann.   

Abstract

Low- and high-frequency cochlear nonlinearity was studied by measuring distortion product otoacoustic emission input/output (DPOAE I/O) functions at 0.5 and 4 kHz in 103 normal-hearing subjects. Behavioral thresholds at both f2's were used to set L2 in dB SL for each subject. Primary levels were optimized by determining the L1 resulting in the largest L(dp) for each L2 for each subject and both f2's. DPOAE I/O functions were measured using L2 inputs from -10 dB SL (0.5 kHz) or -20 dB SL (4 kHz) to 65 dB SL (both frequencies). Mean DPOAE I/O functions, averaged across subjects, differed between the two frequencies, even when threshold was taken into account. The slopes of the I/O functions were similar at 0.5 and 4 kHz for high-level inputs, with maximum compression ratios of about 4:1. At both frequencies, the maximum slope near DPOAE threshold was approximately 1, which occurred at lower levels at 4 kHz, compared to 0.5 kHz. These results suggest that there is a wider dynamic range and perhaps greater cochlear-amplifier gain at 4 kHz, compared to 0.5 kHz. Caution is indicated, however, because of uncertainties in the interpretation of slope and because the confounding influence of differences in noise level could not be completely controlled.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17927427      PMCID: PMC2440918          DOI: 10.1121/1.2751265

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  31 in total

1.  Distortion-product otoacoustic emission measured with continuously varying stimulus level.

Authors:  Stephen T Neely; Tiffany A Johnson; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The level and growth behavior of the 2 f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emission and its relationship to auditory sensitivity in normal hearing and cochlear hearing loss.

Authors:  P Kummer; T Janssen; W Arnold
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Psychophysical measures of auditory nonlinearities as a function of frequency in individuals with normal hearing.

Authors:  M L Hicks; S P Bacon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Basilar-membrane nonlinearity and the growth of forward masking.

Authors:  C J Plack; A J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Otoreflectance of the cochlea and middle ear.

Authors:  D H Keefe
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Interpretation of distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements. II. Estimating tuning characteristics using three stimulus tones.

Authors:  D M Mills
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Sound calibration and distortion product otoacoustic emissions at high frequencies.

Authors:  J H Siegel; E T Hirohata
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Mechanical responses to two-tone distortion products in the apical and basal turns of the mammalian cochlea.

Authors:  N P Cooper; W S Rhode
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Toward optimizing the clinical utility of distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements.

Authors:  L Stover; M P Gorga; S T Neely; D Montoya
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Nonlinear input-output functions derived from the responses of guinea-pig cochlear nerve fibres: variations with characteristic frequency.

Authors:  N P Cooper; G K Yates
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  16 in total

1.  Isoresponse versus isoinput estimates of cochlear filter tuning.

Authors:  Almudena Eustaquio-Martín; Enrique A Lopez-Poveda
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-11-23

2.  Functional modeling of the human auditory brainstem response to broadband stimulation.

Authors:  Sarah Verhulst; Hari M Bharadwaj; Golbarg Mehraei; Christopher A Shera; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Low-frequency and high-frequency distortion product otoacoustic emission suppression in humans.

Authors:  Michael P Gorga; Stephen T Neely; Darcia M Dierking; Judy Kopun; Kristin Jolkowski; Kristin Groenenboom; Hongyang Tan; Bettina Stiegemann
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Comparison of distortion-product otoacoustic emission growth rates and slopes of forward-masked psychometric functions.

Authors:  Joyce Rodríguez; Stephen T Neely; Walt Jesteadt; Hongyang Tan; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Growth of suppression in humans based on distortion-product otoacoustic emission measurements.

Authors:  Michael P Gorga; Stephen T Neely; Judy Kopun; Hongyang Tan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Distortion-Product Otoacoustic Emission Measured Below 300 Hz in Normal-Hearing Human Subjects.

Authors:  Anders T Christensen; Rodrigo Ordoñez; Dorte Hammershøi
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-11-21

7.  No effects of attention or visual perceptual load on cochlear function, as measured with stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Jordan A Beim; Andrew J Oxenham; Magdalena Wojtczak
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 8.  Psychophysical properties of low-frequency hearing: implications for perceiving speech and music via electric and acoustic stimulation.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Michael F Dorman; Christopher A Brown
Journal:  Adv Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-11-25

9.  Sources of variability in distortion product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Cassie A Garner; Stephen T Neely; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Estimates of compression at low and high frequencies using masking additivity in normal and impaired ears.

Authors:  Christopher J Plack; Andrew J Oxenham; Andrea M Simonson; Catherine G O'Hanlon; Vit Drga; Dhany Arifianto
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.