Literature DB >> 9373972

Otoreflectance of the cochlea and middle ear.

D H Keefe1.   

Abstract

Otoreflectance refers to acoustic pressure reflectance measurements in the ear canal, by the use of a leak-free insertion of a probe assembly, in the frequency or time domain over a range of two or more stimulus levels. Otoreflectance includes an iso-level response indicative of the forward transfer of acoustic energy into the middle ear, and nonlinear responses indicative of the acoustic energy reflected back from the cochlea. The nonlinear otoreflectance decouples the reflected energy in an evoked otoacoustic emission (OAE) from its subsequent re-reflected energy due to the presence of the ear-canal probe. Nonlinear otoreflectance responses are extremely sensitive to probe distortion, and a double-evoked (2E) technique, previously used in evoked (OAE) measurements, is adapted for otoreflectance to solve the distortion problem. Results are obtained using a 2E stimulus set containing a set of three click stimuli delivered through a pair of sources. The corresponding sets of three pressure responses are acquired in a calibration tube, and in the ear canal, and a set of three iso-level ear-canal reflectances is calculated. An evoked OAE can be decomposed into a otoacoustic reflected pressure (ORP), and a nonlinear otoreflectance is defined by the ratio of the ORP to the initial pressure spectrum. Otoreflectance provides simultaneous measurements of middle-ear and cochlear responses, and has potential, as yet untested, for application to clinical tests for hearing impairments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9373972     DOI: 10.1121/1.420340

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  12 in total

1.  High frequency transient-evoked otoacoustic emission measurements using chirp and click stimuli.

Authors:  Douglas H Keefe; M Patrick Feeney; Lisa L Hunter; Denis F Fitzpatrick; Chelsea M Blankenship; Angela C Garinis; Daniel B Putterman; Marcin Wróblewski
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Low-frequency and high-frequency cochlear nonlinearity in humans.

Authors:  Michael P Gorga; Stephen T Neely; Darcia M Dierking; Judy Kopun; Kristin Jolkowski; Kristin Groenenboom; Hongyang Tan; Bettina Stiegemann
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Specification of absorbed-sound power in the ear canal: application to suppression of stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Douglas H Keefe; Kim S Schairer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Comparison of nine methods to estimate ear-canal stimulus levels.

Authors:  Natalie N Souza; Sumitrajit Dhar; Stephen T Neely; Jonathan H Siegel
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Comparing otoacoustic emissions evoked by chirp transients with constant absorbed sound power and constant incident pressure magnitude.

Authors:  Douglas H Keefe; M Patrick Feeney; Lisa L Hunter; Denis F Fitzpatrick
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Effects of Forward- and Emitted-Pressure Calibrations on the Variability of Otoacoustic Emission Measurements Across Repeated Probe Fits.

Authors:  Tom Maxim; Christopher A Shera; Karolina K Charaziak; Carolina Abdala
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Behavioral hearing thresholds between 0.125 and 20 kHz using depth-compensated ear simulator calibration.

Authors:  Jungmee Lee; Sumitrajit Dhar; Rebekah Abel; Renee Banakis; Evan Grolley; Jungwha Lee; Steven Zecker; Jonathan Siegel
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Procedures for ambient-pressure and tympanometric tests of aural acoustic reflectance and admittance in human infants and adults.

Authors:  Douglas H Keefe; Lisa L Hunter; M Patrick Feeney; Denis F Fitzpatrick
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Chinchilla middle-ear admittance and sound power: high-frequency estimates and effects of inner-ear modifications.

Authors:  Michael E Ravicz; John J Rosowski
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  High-frequency click-evoked otoacoustic emissions and behavioral thresholds in humans.

Authors:  Shawn S Goodman; Denis F Fitzpatrick; John C Ellison; Walt Jesteadt; Douglas H Keefe
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.