Literature DB >> 18681596

Sources of variability in distortion product otoacoustic emissions.

Cassie A Garner1, Stephen T Neely, Michael P Gorga.   

Abstract

The goal of this study was to determine the extent to which the variability seen in distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs), among ears with normal hearing, could be accounted for. Several factors were selected for investigation, including behavioral threshold, differences in middle-ear transmission characteristics either in the forward or the reverse direction, and differences in contributions from the distortion and reflection sources. These variables were assessed after optimizing stimulus parameters for individual ears at each frequency. A multiple-linear regression was performed to identify whether the selected variables, either individually or in combination, explained significant portions of variability in DPOAE responses. Behavioral threshold at the f(2) frequency and behavioral threshold squared at that same frequency explained the largest amount of variability in DPOAE level, compared to the other variables. The combined model explained a small, but significant, amount of variance in DPOAE level at five frequencies. A large amount of residual variability remained, even at frequencies where the model accounted for significant amounts of variance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18681596      PMCID: PMC2561309          DOI: 10.1121/1.2939126

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  19 in total

1.  Energy transmittance predicts conductive hearing loss in older children and adults.

Authors:  Douglas H Keefe; Jeffrey L Simmons
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Distortion-product otoacoustic emission measured with continuously varying stimulus level.

Authors:  Stephen T Neely; Tiffany A Johnson; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Reducing reflected contributions to ear-canal distortion product otoacoustic emissions in humans.

Authors:  Tiffany A Johnson; Stephen T Neely; Judy G Kopun; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Evidence for a bipolar change in distortion product otoacoustic emissions during contralateral acoustic stimulation in humans.

Authors:  Jörg Müller; Thomas Janssen; Guido Heppelmann; Wolfgang Wagner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Low-frequency and high-frequency cochlear nonlinearity in humans.

Authors:  Michael P Gorga; Stephen T Neely; Darcia M Dierking; Judy Kopun; Kristin Jolkowski; Kristin Groenenboom; Hongyang Tan; Bettina Stiegemann
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Sound calibration and distortion product otoacoustic emissions at high frequencies.

Authors:  J H Siegel; E T Hirohata
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Distortion product otoacoustic emission input/output functions in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired human ears.

Authors:  P A Dorn; D Konrad-Martin; S T Neely; D H Keefe; E Cyr; M P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Olivocochlear reflex effect on human distortion product otoacoustic emissions is largest at frequencies with distinct fine structure dips.

Authors:  W Wagner; G Heppelmann; J Müller; T Janssen; H-P Zenner
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2006-11-29       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Evaluation of cochlear hearing disorders: normative distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements.

Authors:  David M Mills; M Patrick Feeney; George A Gates
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Fine structure of the 2f1-f2 acoustic distortion product: changes with primary level.

Authors:  N J He; R A Schmiedt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  5 in total

1.  Comparing the optimal signal conditions for recording cubic and quadratic distortion product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Lin Bian; Shixiong Chen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Estimating the operating point of the cochlear transducer using low-frequency biased distortion products.

Authors:  Daniel J Brown; Jared J Hartsock; Ruth M Gill; Hillary E Fitzgerald; Alec N Salt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Growth of suppression in humans based on distortion-product otoacoustic emission measurements.

Authors:  Michael P Gorga; Stephen T Neely; Judy Kopun; Hongyang Tan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Reliability of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus).

Authors:  Michelle D Valero; Rama Ratnam
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Correlation between DPOAE I/O functions and pure-tone thresholds.

Authors:  Ualace de Paula Campos; Renata Mota Mamede Carvallo
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.