Literature DB >> 9921659

Psychophysical measures of auditory nonlinearities as a function of frequency in individuals with normal hearing.

M L Hicks1, S P Bacon.   

Abstract

In order to gain a better understanding of how auditory nonlinear phenomena vary as a function of location along the cochlea, several psychophysical measures of nonlinearity were examined as a function of signal frequency. Six normal-hearing individuals completed three experiments, each designed to measure one aspect of nonlinear behavior: (1) the effects of level on frequency selectivity in simultaneous masking, measured using notched-noise maskers at spectrum levels of 30 and 50 dB, (2) two-tone suppression, measured using forward maskers at the signal frequency (fs) and suppressor tones above fs, and (3) growth of masking, measured using forward maskers below fs at a signal/masker frequency ratio of 1.44. Four signal frequencies (375, 750, 1500, and 3000 Hz) were tested to sample the nonlinear behavior at different locations along the basilar membrane, in order to test the hypothesis that the apical (low-frequency) region of the cochlea behaves more linearly than the basal (high-frequency) region. In general, all three measures revealed a progressive increase in nonlinear behavior as signal frequency increased, with little or no nonlinearity at the lowest frequency, consistent with the hypothesis.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9921659     DOI: 10.1121/1.424526

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  21 in total

1.  Forward masking additivity and auditory compression at low and high frequencies.

Authors:  Christopher J Plack; Catherine G O'Hanlon
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2003-09

2.  Estimates of human cochlear tuning at low levels using forward and simultaneous masking.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2003-07-10

3.  The effects of ipsilateral, contralateral, and bilateral broadband noise on the mid-level hump in intensity discrimination.

Authors:  Elin Roverud; Elizabeth A Strickland
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Psychophysical estimates of nonlinear cochlear processing in younger and older listeners.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Sid P Bacon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Level dependence of auditory filters in nonsimultaneous masking as a function of frequency.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham; Andrea M Simonson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Speech identification based on temporal fine structure cues.

Authors:  Stanley Sheft; Marine Ardoint; Christian Lorenzi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Low-frequency and high-frequency distortion product otoacoustic emission suppression in humans.

Authors:  Michael P Gorga; Stephen T Neely; Darcia M Dierking; Judy Kopun; Kristin Jolkowski; Kristin Groenenboom; Hongyang Tan; Bettina Stiegemann
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Low-frequency and high-frequency cochlear nonlinearity in humans.

Authors:  Michael P Gorga; Stephen T Neely; Darcia M Dierking; Judy Kopun; Kristin Jolkowski; Kristin Groenenboom; Hongyang Tan; Bettina Stiegemann
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Contribution of Cochlear Compression to Discrimination of Rippled Spectra in On- and Low-frequency Noise.

Authors:  Olga N Milekhina; Dmitry I Nechaev; Alexander Ya Supin
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-05-21

10.  The effects of preceding sound and stimulus duration on measures of suppression in younger and older adults.

Authors:  Erica L Hegland; Elizabeth A Strickland
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.