Literature DB >> 15807014

Distortion-product otoacoustic emission measured with continuously varying stimulus level.

Stephen T Neely1, Tiffany A Johnson, Michael P Gorga.   

Abstract

Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAE) are measured by stimulating the ear with two simultaneous tones. A novel method for measuring DPOAEs has been developed in which the tone levels vary continuously instead of in discrete steps. Varying the tone levels continuously may offer advantages for characterizing DPOAE level as a function of stimulus level. For equivalent primary levels, DPOAE levels measured with the continuous-level method were the same as levels obtained with the discrete-level method, thus validating the new method. Continuous-level measurements were used to determine the optimal L1 for each L2 in individual subjects (N= 20) at f2 = 1, 2, 4, and 8 kHz by using a Lissajous path that covered a wide range of stimulus levels. The optimal L1 (defined as the L1 that resulted in the largest DPOAE for each L2) varied across subjects and across frequency. The optimal difference between L1 and L2 decreased with increasing L2 at all frequencies, and increased with frequency when L2 was low. When the optimal L1 was determined individually for each ear, the DPOAE levels were larger and less variable than those obtained using the equation for L1 suggested by Kummer et al. [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 103, 3431-3444 (1998)].

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15807014      PMCID: PMC1414785          DOI: 10.1121/1.1853253

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  22 in total

1.  Similarity in loudness and distortion product otoacoustic emission input/output functions: implications for an objective hearing aid adjustment.

Authors:  Jörg Müller; Thomas Janssen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The behavior of the acoustic distortion product, 2f1-f2, from the human ear and its relation to auditory sensitivity.

Authors:  S A Gaskill; A M Brown
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The influence of systematic primary-tone level variation L2-L1 on the acoustic distortion product emission 2f1-f2 in normal human ears.

Authors:  R Hauser; R Probst
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Guidelines for screening for hearing impairment and middle-ear disorders. Working Group on Acoustic Immittance Measurements and the Committee on Audiologic Evaluation. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.

Authors: 
Journal:  ASHA Suppl       Date:  1990-04

5.  Acoustic distortion products in humans: systematic changes in amplitudes as a function of f2/f1 ratio.

Authors:  F P Harris; B L Lonsbury-Martin; B B Stagner; A C Coats; G K Martin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Response of binaural neurons of dog superior olivary complex to dichotic tonal stimuli: some physiological mechanisms of sound localization.

Authors:  J M Goldberg; P B Brown
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1969-07       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Nonlinear mechanics at the apex of the guinea-pig cochlea.

Authors:  N P Cooper; W S Rhode
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Dependence of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions on primary levels in normal and impaired ears. I. Effects of decreasing L2 below L1.

Authors:  M L Whitehead; M J McCoy; B L Lonsbury-Martin; G K Martin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Measurement of acoustic distortion reveals underlying similarities between human and rodent mechanical responses.

Authors:  A M Brown; S A Gaskill
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Dependence of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions on primary levels in normal and impaired ears. II. Asymmetry in L1,L2 space.

Authors:  M L Whitehead; B B Stagner; M J McCoy; B L Lonsbury-Martin; G K Martin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  28 in total

1.  Influence of calibration method on distortion-product otoacoustic emission measurements: II. threshold prediction.

Authors:  Abigail R Rogers; Sienna R Burke; Judy G Kopun; Hongyang Tan; Stephen T Neely; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Influence of calibration method on distortion-product otoacoustic emission measurements: I. test performance.

Authors:  Sienna R Burke; Abigail R Rogers; Stephen T Neely; Judy G Kopun; Hongyang Tan; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  A validation and potential clinical application of multivariate analyses of distortion-product otoacoustic emission data.

Authors:  Michael P Gorga; Darcia M Dierking; Tiffany A Johnson; Kathryn L Beauchaine; Cassie A Garner; Stephen T Neely
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Reducing reflected contributions to ear-canal distortion product otoacoustic emissions in humans.

Authors:  Tiffany A Johnson; Stephen T Neely; Judy G Kopun; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Influence of primary-level and primary-frequency ratios on human distortion product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Tiffany A Johnson; Stephen T Neely; Cassie A Garner; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Distortion product otoacoustic emissions: cochlear-source contributions and clinical test performance.

Authors:  Tiffany A Johnson; Stephen T Neely; Judy G Kopun; Darcia M Dierking; Hongyang Tan; Connie Converse; Elizabeth Kennedy; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Comparing the optimal signal conditions for recording cubic and quadratic distortion product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Lin Bian; Shixiong Chen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Relation of distortion-product otoacoustic emission input-output functions to loudness.

Authors:  Daniel M Rasetshwane; Stephen T Neely; Judy G Kopun; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Influence of stimulus parameters on amplitude-modulated stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Tiffany A Johnson; Laura Beshaler
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Low-frequency and high-frequency distortion product otoacoustic emission suppression in humans.

Authors:  Michael P Gorga; Stephen T Neely; Darcia M Dierking; Judy Kopun; Kristin Jolkowski; Kristin Groenenboom; Hongyang Tan; Bettina Stiegemann
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.