Literature DB >> 9440336

Interpretation of distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements. II. Estimating tuning characteristics using three stimulus tones.

D M Mills1.   

Abstract

The simple model introduced in Part I [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 102, 413-429 (1997)] is used to simulate the response of the cochlea to three stimulus tones. The focus is on "emission suppression tuning curves" constructed using a third tone to suppress the cubic distortion tone emission (CDT, 2f1-f2) generated by two primary tones at frequencies f1 and f2 (intensities L1 and L2). A criterion decrease (here, 5 dB) of the CDT emission amplitude defines the 2f1-f2 emission suppression tuning curve. Applying traditional tuning curve measures to emission suppression tuning curves appears ineffective in determining the underlying cochlear amplifier characteristics. However, it is shown that there are three characteristics of emission suppression tuning curves which are particularly useful: (1) the "f2 threshold" which is the level of the third tone, L3, required for the criterion CDT amplitude decrease, under the condition that the third tone frequency, f3, is approximately equal to f2; (2) the "shoulder threshold" similarly defined for f3 << f2; and (3) the "tuning width," w40. The tuning width is defined to be the distance (in octaves) from the frequency f2 to the upper f3 frequency for which there is a criterion CDT decrease, in this case using the L3 level which is 40 dB above the f2 threshold. Model calculations appropriate to gerbils show that these measures are most accurately related to the underlying cochlear amplifier characteristics for parameters where the primary stimulus amplitudes satisfy L1/L2 > 20 dB and for which L1 is 25 dB or more below the sharp "notch" seen in the two tone input-output function. In this parameter region, the cochlear amplifier characteristics are related to measured quantities by the relationships wr approximately equal to w40 and Ga approximately equal to TE + w40gp. Here, Ga is the gain (dB) of the cochlear amplifier, defined as the total increase in cochlear response over the passive response, wr is the distance (octaves) over which the active cochlear response rises to a maximum, and gp is the passive increase (dB/octave) of the traveling wave along the basilar membrane. The measured quantities are TE, the difference (dB) between the shoulder threshold and the f2 threshold, and the tuning width, w40 (octaves), defined above. Model predictions are confirmed by measurements in adult gerbils.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9440336     DOI: 10.1121/1.421101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  12 in total

1.  An alternate approach to constructing distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) suppression tuning curves.

Authors:  Tiffany A Johnson; Stephen T Neely; Darcia M Dierking; Brenda M Hoover; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission suppression tuning in humans: comparison to behavioral tuning.

Authors:  Karolina K Charaziak; Pamela Souza; Jonathan H Siegel
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-09-07

3.  Low-frequency and high-frequency distortion product otoacoustic emission suppression in humans.

Authors:  Michael P Gorga; Stephen T Neely; Darcia M Dierking; Judy Kopun; Kristin Jolkowski; Kristin Groenenboom; Hongyang Tan; Bettina Stiegemann
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Low-frequency and high-frequency cochlear nonlinearity in humans.

Authors:  Michael P Gorga; Stephen T Neely; Darcia M Dierking; Judy Kopun; Kristin Jolkowski; Kristin Groenenboom; Hongyang Tan; Bettina Stiegemann
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Distortion-product otoacoustic emission suppression tuning curves in humans.

Authors:  Michael P Gorga; Stephen T Neely; Judy Kopun; Hongyang Tan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Growth of suppression in humans based on distortion-product otoacoustic emission measurements.

Authors:  Michael P Gorga; Stephen T Neely; Judy Kopun; Hongyang Tan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Characterizing distortion-product otoacoustic emission components across four species.

Authors:  Glen K Martin; Barden B Stagner; You Sun Chung; Brenda L Lonsbury-Martin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Distortion-product otoacoustic emission suppression tuning curves in hearing-impaired humans.

Authors:  Alyson Gruhlke; Cori Birkholz; Stephen T Neely; Judy Kopun; Hongyang Tan; Walt Jesteadt; Kendra Schmid; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Evidence for basal distortion-product otoacoustic emission components.

Authors:  Glen K Martin; Barden B Stagner; Brenda L Lonsbury-Martin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Two-tone suppression of stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Douglas H Keefe; John C Ellison; Denis F Fitzpatrick; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.