Literature DB >> 19955721

Psychophysical properties of low-frequency hearing: implications for perceiving speech and music via electric and acoustic stimulation.

René H Gifford, Michael F Dorman, Christopher A Brown.   

Abstract

We have investigated the psychophysical properties of low-frequency hearing, both before and after implantation, to see if we can account for the benefit to speech understanding and melody recognition of adding acoustic stimulation to electric stimulation. In this paper, we review our work and the work of others and describe preliminary results not previously published. We show (a) that it is possible to preserve normal or near-normal nonlinear cochlear processing in the implanted ear following electric and acoustic stimulation surgery - though this is not the typical outcome; (b) that although low-frequency frequency selectivity is generally disrupted following implantation, some degree of frequency selectivity can be preserved, and (c) that neither nonlinear cochlear processing nor frequency selectivity in the acoustic hearing ear is correlated with the gain in speech understanding afforded by combined electric and acoustic stimulation. In another set of experiments, we show that the value of preserving hearing in the implanted ear is best seen in complex listening environments in which binaural cues can play a role in perception. Copyright 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19955721      PMCID: PMC3697738          DOI: 10.1159/000262596

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0065-3071


  39 in total

1.  Noise susceptibility of cochlear implant users: the role of spectral resolution and smearing.

Authors:  Qian-Jie Fu; Geraldine Nogaki
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2005-04-22

2.  Preservation of hearing in cochlear implant surgery: advantages of combined electrical and acoustical speech processing.

Authors:  Bruce J Gantz; Christopher Turner; Kate E Gfeller; Mary W Lowder
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  Speech and melody recognition in binaurally combined acoustic and electric hearing.

Authors:  Ying-Yee Kong; Ginger S Stickney; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  The benefits of combining acoustic and electric stimulation for the recognition of speech, voice and melodies.

Authors:  Michael F Dorman; Rene H Gifford; Anthony J Spahr; Sharon A McKarns
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2007-11-29       Impact factor: 1.854

Review 5.  Music perception in cochlear implant users and its relationship with psychophysical capabilities.

Authors:  Ward R Drennan; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2008

6.  Low-frequency and high-frequency cochlear nonlinearity in humans.

Authors:  Michael P Gorga; Stephen T Neely; Darcia M Dierking; Judy Kopun; Kristin Jolkowski; Kristin Groenenboom; Hongyang Tan; Bettina Stiegemann
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Masker phase effects in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners: evidence for peripheral compression at low signal frequencies.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham; Torsten Dau
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Electric acoustic stimulation of the auditory system: results of a multi-centre investigation.

Authors:  Wolfgang K Gstoettner; Paul van de Heyning; Alec Fitzgerald O'Connor; Constantino Morera; Manuel Sainz; Katrien Vermeire; Sonelle Mcdonald; Laura Cavallé; Silke Helbig; Juan García Valdecasas; Ilona Anderson; Oliver F Adunka
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.494

9.  Estimates of compression at low and high frequencies using masking additivity in normal and impaired ears.

Authors:  Christopher J Plack; Andrew J Oxenham; Andrea M Simonson; Catherine G O'Hanlon; Vit Drga; Dhany Arifianto
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Hearing preservation surgery: psychophysical estimates of cochlear damage in recipients of a short electrode array.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Michael F Dorman; Anthony J Spahr; Sid P Bacon; Henryk Skarzynski; Artur Lorens
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.482

View more
  24 in total

1.  Interaural spectral asymmetry and sensitivity to interaural time differences.

Authors:  Christopher A Brown; William A Yost
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Impact of Intrascalar Electrode Location, Electrode Type, and Angular Insertion Depth on Residual Hearing in Cochlear Implant Patients: Preliminary Results.

Authors:  George B Wanna; Jack H Noble; Rene H Gifford; Mary S Dietrich; Alex D Sweeney; Dongqing Zhang; Benoit M Dawant; Alejandro Rivas; Robert F Labadie
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.311

3.  Spectral overlap and interaural time difference sensitivity: possible role of binaural interference.

Authors:  Christopher A Brown; William A Yost
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 4.  A systematic review of electric-acoustic stimulation: device fitting ranges, outcomes, and clinical fitting practices.

Authors:  Paola V Incerti; Teresa Y C Ching; Robert Cowan
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2013-03

5.  Auditory training in patients with unilateral cochlear implant and contralateral acoustic stimulation.

Authors:  Ting Zhang; Michael F Dorman; Qian-Jie Fu; Anthony J Spahr
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Availability of binaural cues for bilateral implant recipients and bimodal listeners with and without preserved hearing in the implanted ear.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Michael F Dorman; Sterling W Sheffield; Kate Teece; Amy P Olund
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 1.854

7.  Localization and interaural time difference (ITD) thresholds for cochlear implant recipients with preserved acoustic hearing in the implanted ear.

Authors:  René H Gifford; D Wesley Grantham; Sterling W Sheffield; Timothy J Davis; Robert Dwyer; Michael F Dorman
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Speech masking release in Hybrid cochlear implant users: Roles of spectral and temporal cues in electric-acoustic hearing.

Authors:  Viral D Tejani; Carolyn J Brown
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Cochlear implantation with hearing preservation yields significant benefit for speech recognition in complex listening environments.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Michael F Dorman; Henryk Skarzynski; Artur Lorens; Marek Polak; Colin L W Driscoll; Peter Roland; Craig A Buchman
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Relationship between auditory function of nonimplanted ears and bimodal benefit.

Authors:  Ting Zhang; Anthony J Spahr; Michael F Dorman; Aniket Saoji
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.