Literature DB >> 1790401

In vivo and in vitro precision for bone density measured by dual-energy X-ray absorption.

J Lilley1, B G Walters, D A Heath, Z Drolc.   

Abstract

An investigation was made into some of the major sources of error influencing the bone mineral density (BMD) measurements of the lumbar vertebrae, the femoral neck and the greater trochanter. The effect on accuracy and reproducibility of the following parameters was investigated: influence of patient positioning, patient size, scan speed, the technique of scan analysis and the temporal variation in instrument performance. The in vitro precision, both long-term and short-term, was assessed using aluminium phantoms supplied by the manufacturer. For the spine phantom, the precision expressed as a percentage coefficient of variation (%CV) was found to be 0.4% (10 scans) in the short term and 0.55% (15 scans) in the long term. Measured precision (short-term) for the three regions of the femur phantom analysed by the software was 1.3% for the neck of femur, 1.7% for Ward's triangle and 0.6% for the trochanter. Long-term precision was 1.0%, 1.9% and 1.1% respectively. No statistically significant difference was found between long- and short-term results. Short-term in vitro precision on a low density anthropological phantom was 4.1%, 4.2%, 2.4% and 0.61% for neck of femur, Ward's triangle, trochanter and spine respectively. In vivo short-term precision for the lumbar spine (L2-L4), measured by scanning four normal volunteers five times in one session, was found to be 0.8 +/- 0.25%. In vivo precision for the femur, measured on seven volunteers was 1.6 +/- 0.8% for the neck of femur, 3.2 +/- 1.7% for Ward's triangle and 2.2 +/- 1.1% for the trochanter.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1790401     DOI: 10.1007/bf01625443

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  12 in total

Review 1.  Methods of bone mineral measurement.

Authors:  P Tothill
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 2.  An evaluation of the contribution of bone mass measurements to clinical practice.

Authors:  I Fogelman
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 4.446

3.  [Measurement of bone mineral content by quantitative digital radiography. First results in the lumbar vertebrae].

Authors:  P Braillon; F Duboeuf; M F Meary; P Barret; P D Delmas; P J Meunier
Journal:  Presse Med       Date:  1989-05-27       Impact factor: 1.228

Review 4.  Impact of bone mineral measurements on osteoporosis.

Authors:  I Fogelman; A Rodin; G Blake
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1990

5.  Comparative assessment of dual-photon absorptiometry and dual-energy radiography.

Authors:  C C Glüer; P Steiger; R Selvidge; K Elliesen-Kliefoth; C Hayashi; H K Genant
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 6.  Should perimenopausal women be screened for osteoporosis?

Authors:  S R Cummings; D Black
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  The relative significance of trabecular and cortical bone density as a diagnostic index for osteoporosis.

Authors:  I Leichter; A Bivas; A Giveon; J Y Margulies; A Weinreb
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Dual energy radiography (DER): a preliminary comparative study.

Authors:  R Pacifici; R Rupich; I Vered; K C Fischer; M Griffin; N Susman; L V Avioli
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 4.333

9.  The range of bone density in normal British women.

Authors:  M L Hall; J Heavens; I D Cullum; P J Ell
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  Quantitative digital radiography versus dual photon absorptiometry of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  T L Kelly; D M Slovik; D A Schoenfeld; R M Neer
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 5.958

View more
  17 in total

1.  Hormone replacement therapy in galactosaemic twins with ovarian failure and severe osteoporosis.

Authors:  C Renner; S Razeghi; M A Uberall; P Licht; L Wildt; H G Dörr; J Hensen; S Schweitzer
Journal:  J Inherit Metab Dis       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.982

Review 2.  Current methods and advances in bone densitometry.

Authors:  G Guglielmi; C C Gluer; S Majumdar; B A Blunt; H K Genant
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Enhanced precision with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  R Mazess; C H Chesnut; M McClung; H Genant
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 4.333

4.  Comparison and investigation of bone mineral density in opposing femora by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  J Lilley; B G Walters; D A Heath; Z Drolc
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Accurate assessment of precision errors: how to measure the reproducibility of bone densitometry techniques.

Authors:  C C Glüer; G Blake; Y Lu; B A Blunt; M Jergas; H K Genant
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Effect of exercise training programme on bone mineral density in novice college rowers.

Authors:  B Cohen; P J Millett; B Mist; M A Laskey; N Rushton
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 13.800

7.  Long-term performance in vitro and in vivo of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  J Y Reginster; R Deroisy; B Zegels; I Jupsin; A Albert; P Franchimont
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 2.980

8.  Cross-calibration of DXA equipment: upgrading from a Hologic QDR 1000/W to a QDR 2000.

Authors:  K G Faulkner; C C Glüer; M Estilo; H K Genant
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 4.333

9.  Spine and femur BMD by DXA in patients with varying severity spinal osteoporosis.

Authors:  P J Ryan; G M Blake; R Herd; J Parker; I Fogelman
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 4.333

10.  Urinary excretion of the pyridinium cross-links of collagen in systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  Y Kipen; R Will; B J Strauss; E F Morand
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.980

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.