Literature DB >> 2407534

Impact of bone mineral measurements on osteoporosis.

I Fogelman1, A Rodin, G Blake.   

Abstract

Dual photon absorptiometry enables measurement of bone mineral to be carried out at the clinically relevant sites of the spine and femur. Few would argue that it provides a powerful research tool, but defining its role in clinical practice has been somewhat more difficult. With the advent of X-ray based systems, studies can be rapidly carried out with improved precision, which has led to increased clinical interest. It is probable that this technology will be incorporated into routine use in the near future. In the present review we have addressed the role of dual photon absorptiometry in areas pertinent to osteoporosis and the direction in which recent developments are leading with regard to future research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2407534     DOI: 10.1007/bf01566011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0340-6997


  94 in total

1.  Premenopausal bone loss in the lumbar spine and neck of femur: a study of 225 Caucasian women.

Authors:  A Rodin; B Murby; M A Smith; M Caleffi; I Fentiman; M G Chapman; I Fogelman
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.398

2.  Bone mineral measurements in clinical practice.

Authors:  B Murby; I Fogelman
Journal:  Br J Hosp Med       Date:  1987-05

3.  Prediction of rapid bone loss in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  C Christiansen; B J Riis; P Rødbro
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1987-05-16       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Dichromatic absorptiometry of vertebral bone mineral content.

Authors:  C R Wilson; M Madsen
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1977 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.016

5.  A comparison of single and multi-site BMC measurements for assessment of spine fracture probability.

Authors:  R D Wasnich; P D Ross; J W Davis; J M Vogel
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  The loss of bone mineral with aging and its relationship to risk of fracture.

Authors:  D M Smith; M R Khairi; C C Johnston
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1975-08       Impact factor: 14.808

7.  Ultradistal and cortical forearm bone density in the assessment of postmenopausal bone loss and nonaxial fracture risk.

Authors:  R I Price; M P Barnes; D H Gutteridge; M Baron-Hay; R L Prince; R W Retallack; C Hickling
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  Relationship between bone mineral content and frequency of postmenopausal fractures.

Authors:  G F Jensen; C Christiansen; J Boesen; V Hegedüs; I Transbøl
Journal:  Acta Med Scand       Date:  1983

9.  Does bone measurement on the radius indicate skeletal status? Concise communication.

Authors:  R B Mazess; W W Peppler; R W Chesney; T A Lange; U Lindgren; E Smith
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  Fractured neck of femur. Prevention and management. Summary and recommendations of a report of the Royal College of Physicians.

Authors: 
Journal:  J R Coll Physicians Lond       Date:  1989-01
View more
  3 in total

1.  In vivo and in vitro precision for bone density measured by dual-energy X-ray absorption.

Authors:  J Lilley; B G Walters; D A Heath; Z Drolc
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy.

Authors:  A E Raffle
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-03-06

3.  Fractal signature analysis of macroradiographs measures trabecular organization in lumbar vertebrae of postmenopausal women.

Authors:  J C Buckland-Wright; J A Lynch; J Rymer; I Fogelman
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 4.333

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.