Literature DB >> 3085566

Should perimenopausal women be screened for osteoporosis?

S R Cummings, D Black.   

Abstract

The increasing availability of noninvasive methods for measuring bone mass raises the issue of whether perimenopausal women should routinely have such measurements to identify those at risk for osteoporotic fractures of the hip, wrist, and spine. Although the mortality and morbidity caused by hip fractures would warrant routine screening, measurement of bone mass has uncertain value in assessing the risk for hip fracture. Wrist fractures generally cause only transient disability, and measurement of bone mass may not reliably predict risk. Measurements of bone density of the spine might be better able to assess a woman's risk for vertebral fractures, but the value of screening depends on whether the findings would affect a woman's decision about using estrogen therapy after menopause. Serial measurements of bone mass to estimate a woman's rate of bone loss are relatively imprecise, increase the cost of screening, and have at best a limited role in screening women to assess risk for osteoporotic fractures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3085566     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-104-6-817

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  39 in total

Review 1.  Using bone densitometry to monitor therapy in treating osteoporosis: pros and cons.

Authors:  C L Deal
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.592

2.  Comparison and investigation of bone mineral density in opposing femora by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  J Lilley; B G Walters; D A Heath; Z Drolc
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 3.  Alendronate and risedronate for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis: clinical profiles of the once-weekly and once-daily dosing formulations.

Authors:  Ronald Emkey
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2004-07-19

4.  FRAX or fiction: determining optimal screening strategies for treatment of osteoporosis in residents in long-term care facilities.

Authors:  Susan L Greenspan; Subashan Perera; David Nace; Kimberly S Zukowski; Mary A Ferchak; Carroll J Lee; Smita Nayak; Neil M Resnick
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 5.562

5.  In vivo and in vitro precision for bone density measured by dual-energy X-ray absorption.

Authors:  J Lilley; B G Walters; D A Heath; Z Drolc
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis: synopsis of a WHO report. WHO Study Group.

Authors:  J A Kanis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Biochemical bone markers compared with bone density measurement by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  J Lotz; D Steeger; G Hafner; W Ehrenthal; J Heine; W Prellwitz
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 8.  Bone mass measurement, fracture risk, and screening for osteoporosis.

Authors:  D I Rosenthal; A N Tosteson
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1989 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.792

9.  Hip protector compliance among older people living in residential care homes.

Authors:  C Cryer; A Knox; D Martin; J Barlow
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.399

10.  Reproducibility of DXA measurements of bone mineral density and body composition in children.

Authors:  Cheryl M Leonard; Melissa A Roza; Ronald D Barr; Colin E Webber
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2008-12-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.