Literature DB >> 7789060

Long-term performance in vitro and in vivo of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

J Y Reginster1, R Deroisy, B Zegels, I Jupsin, A Albert, P Franchimont.   

Abstract

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is actually considered as one of the most appropriate techniques for measuring bone mineral content (BMC) and bone mineral density (BMD). An anthropomorphic phantom and a 25-year-old girl were repeatedly measured, 160 times and 50 times respectively, over an 18-month period to investigate performance in vitro and in vivo of a commercial DXA equipment (HOLOGIC QDR 1000). DXA is a highly accurate technique, the BMC and BMD determinations only overestimated the exact value of the phantom by 0.20% and 0.51% respectively. In vivo long-term (18 months) reproducibility of BMD of the spine is characterized by an interassay coefficient of variation (CVt) of 0.8% while, for the different regions of interest of the hip, BMD CVt varies from 1.1% (total zone) to 5.3% (Ward's triangle). In the subject tested, BMD sensitivity for changes of 2.2% at the lumbar spine and 3% at the hip were recorded.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7789060     DOI: 10.1007/bf02214940

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Rheumatol        ISSN: 0770-3198            Impact factor:   2.980


  28 in total

1.  In vitro comparability of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) bone densitometers.

Authors:  M L Rencken; R Murano; B L Drinkwater; C H Chesnut
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 4.333

2.  Longitudinal precision of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry in a multicenter study. The Nafarelin/Bone Study Group.

Authors:  E S Orwoll; S K Oviatt
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 6.741

3.  Calibration and standardization of bone mineral densitometers.

Authors:  T L Kelly; D M Slovik; R M Neer
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 6.741

4.  Comparative assessment of dual-photon absorptiometry and dual-energy radiography.

Authors:  C C Glüer; P Steiger; R Selvidge; K Elliesen-Kliefoth; C Hayashi; H K Genant
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Precision error in dual-photon absorptiometry related to source age.

Authors:  P D Ross; R D Wasnich; J M Vogel
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  In vivo long-term precision of spinal bone mass measurement by dual photon absorptiometry.

Authors:  J Y Reginster; P Geusens; J Nijs; D Denis; P Franchimont; J Dequeker
Journal:  Bone Miner       Date:  1989-05

7.  Comparison of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and dual photon absorptiometry for bone mineral measurements of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  H W Wahner; W L Dunn; M L Brown; R L Morin; B L Riggs
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 7.616

8.  [Measurement of lumbar bone mineral density by biphoton absorptiometry. Methodology. Reproductibility. Normal values].

Authors:  P Braillon; F Duboeuf; P D Delmas; P J Meunier
Journal:  Pathol Biol (Paris)       Date:  1987-11

9.  Quantitative digital radiography versus dual photon absorptiometry of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  T L Kelly; D M Slovik; D A Schoenfeld; R M Neer
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 5.958

10.  Sensitivity of dual-photon absorptiometry in spinal osteoporosis.

Authors:  J M Pouilles; F Tremollieres; J P Louvet; B Fournie; G Morlock; C Ribot
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 4.333

View more
  3 in total

1.  Minimum sample size requirements for bone density precision assessment produce inconsistency in clinical monitoring.

Authors:  W D Leslie; A Moayyeri
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-08-10       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  A study of the long-term precision of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry bone densitometers and implications for the validity of the least-significant-change calculation.

Authors:  T N Hangartner
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-11-30       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Temperature influence on DXA measurements: bone mineral density acquisition in frozen and thawed human femora.

Authors:  Dirk Wähnert; Konrad L Hoffmeier; Gabriele Lehmann; Rosemarie Fröber; Gunther O Hofmann; Thomas Mückley
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 2.362

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.