Literature DB >> 8467405

Spine and femur BMD by DXA in patients with varying severity spinal osteoporosis.

P J Ryan1, G M Blake, R Herd, J Parker, I Fogelman.   

Abstract

Bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine, femoral neck, trochanteric region, and Ward's triangle was measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in 118 women with osteoporotic vertebral collapse (average age 65 years), divided into four groups according to numbers and SD of vertebral deformation below norms: group 1: -3SD deformations only; group 2: one -4SD deformation; group 3: two-four -4SD deformations; and group 4: 5 or more -4SD deformations. There were no significant differences between the groups. Results were compared with those from 80 premenopausal (average age 32 years, range 20-40 years) and 109 postmenopausal normal women (average age 64, range 60-70 years). Mean BMD in osteoporotic group 1 was lower than premenopausal normal women by 32% at the lumbar spine, 31% femoral neck, 30% trochanteric region, and 44% at Ward's triangle, and postmenopausal controls by 17% lumbar spine, 16% femoral neck, 17% trochanter, and 14% Ward's triangle. There was a clear trend to reduction in mean BMD between osteoporotic groups 1 and 4 at all four measured sites with significant differences at the spine of 0.102 g/cm2 (P < 0.01) and Ward's triangle 0.059 g/cm2 (P < 0.01). When compared with premenopausal controls, there was a reduction in mean BMD between osteoporotic groups 1 and 4 of 10% at the lumbar spine, 7% femoral neck, 8% trochanteric region, and 13% Ward's triangle. Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed no significant differences in diagnostic sensitivities among the four measured sites for vertebral fractures. We conclude from this cross-sectional data that the majority of bone loss in spinal osteoporosis occurs before the onset of fractures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8467405     DOI: 10.1007/bf00296649

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int        ISSN: 0171-967X            Impact factor:   4.333


  29 in total

Review 1.  Clinical use of bone densitometry.

Authors:  C C Johnston; C W Slemenda; L J Melton
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-04-18       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  A comparison of dual energy radiography measurements at the lumbar spine and proximal femur for the diagnosis of osteoporosis.

Authors:  M G Griffin; R C Rupich; L V Avioli; R Pacifici
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 5.958

3.  Epidemiology of vertebral fractures in women.

Authors:  L J Melton; S H Kan; M A Frye; H W Wahner; W M O'Fallon; B L Riggs
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

Authors:  J A Hanley; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Mild versus definite osteoporosis: comparison of bone densitometry techniques using different statistical models.

Authors:  A F Heuck; J Block; C C Glueer; P Steiger; H K Genant
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  Changes in bone mineral density of the proximal femur and spine with aging. Differences between the postmenopausal and senile osteoporosis syndromes.

Authors:  B L Riggs; H W Wahner; E Seeman; K P Offord; W L Dunn; R B Mazess; K A Johnson; L J Melton
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 14.808

7.  Effect of salcatonin given intranasally on bone mass and fracture rates in established osteoporosis: a dose-response study.

Authors:  K Overgaard; M A Hansen; S B Jensen; C Christiansen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-09-05

8.  The effect of vertebral collapse on spinal bone mineral density measurements in osteoporosis.

Authors:  P J Ryan; P Evans; G M Blake; I Fogeman
Journal:  Bone Miner       Date:  1992-09

9.  Ability of vertebral dimensions from a single radiograph to identify fractures.

Authors:  P D Ross; J W Davis; R S Epstein; R D Wasnich
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 4.333

10.  Dual energy radiography versus quantitative computer tomography for the diagnosis of osteoporosis.

Authors:  R Pacifici; R Rupich; M Griffin; A Chines; N Susman; L V Avioli
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 5.958

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Current methods and advances in bone densitometry.

Authors:  G Guglielmi; C C Gluer; S Majumdar; B A Blunt; H K Genant
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Accurate assessment of precision errors: how to measure the reproducibility of bone densitometry techniques.

Authors:  C C Glüer; G Blake; Y Lu; B A Blunt; M Jergas; H K Genant
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.507

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.