Literature DB >> 2294552

Comparative assessment of dual-photon absorptiometry and dual-energy radiography.

C C Glüer1, P Steiger, R Selvidge, K Elliesen-Kliefoth, C Hayashi, H K Genant.   

Abstract

Dual-energy bone densitometry can be performed with two types of scanners. The traditional dual-photon absorptiometry (DPA) machines use an isotope source, whereas the newly introduced dual-energy radiography (DER) devices use an incorporated x-ray tube. The authors evaluated the performance of DPA and DER devices at their institution. The short-term precision error in vivo was 1.2% for femoral neck measurements with DER. Long-term precision error in vitro was reduced from 1.30% (DPA) to 0.44% (DER). The scanning time for both spine and hip measurements was reduced from 20-40 minutes to 6-7 minutes. Intraosseous fat sensitivity remained the same, at a level of 12 mg/cm2 apparent decrease of bone mineral density (BMD) per 10% fat by volume change, and for both devices there was no shift in BMD when phantom thickness was increased by 1.5 inches. The correlation of DPA and DER was high: r = .98 for the spine and r = .95 for the femoral neck. Correlation of DPA versus quantitative computed tomography (CT) (r = .83) and DER versus quantitative CT (r = .85) was good. The advent of DER represents a significant advance for the field of bone densitometry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2294552     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.174.1.2294552

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  30 in total

Review 1.  Current methods and advances in bone densitometry.

Authors:  G Guglielmi; C C Gluer; S Majumdar; B A Blunt; H K Genant
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Acronyms in bone densitometry.

Authors:  H K Genant; C C Glüer; K G Faulkner; S Majumdar; S T Harris; K Engelke; C van Kuijk
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Acronyms in bone densitometry.

Authors:  H K Genant; C C Glüer; K G Faulkner; S Majumdar; S T Harris; K Engelke; S Hagiwaea; C van Kuijk
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 4.333

4.  Comparative assessment of bone mineral density of the forearm using single photon and dual X-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  J W Nieves; F Cosman; C Mars; R Lindsay
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 4.333

5.  Acronyms in bone densitometry.

Authors:  H K Genant; C C Glüer; K G Faulkner; S Majumdar; S T Harris; K Engelke; S Hagiwara; C van Kuijk
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Measurements of bone mineral density of the proximal femur by two commercially available dual energy X-ray absorptiometric systems.

Authors:  O L Svendsen; U Marslew; C Hassager; C Christiansen
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1992

7.  Ultrasound velocity changes at the proximal phalanxes of the hand in pre-, peri- and postmenopausal women.

Authors:  V Ventura; M Mauloni; M Mura; F Paltrinieri; D de Aloysio
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  An evaluation of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and comparison with dual-photon absorptiometry.

Authors:  B Lees; J C Stevenson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 9.  Bone imaging: traditional techniques and their interpretation.

Authors:  Holger F Boehm; Thomas M Link
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.096

10.  In vivo and in vitro precision for bone density measured by dual-energy X-ray absorption.

Authors:  J Lilley; B G Walters; D A Heath; Z Drolc
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.