Literature DB >> 1421794

Comparison and investigation of bone mineral density in opposing femora by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

J Lilley1, B G Walters, D A Heath, Z Drolc.   

Abstract

A dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) machine was used to measure the bone mineral density (BMD) of both femora in 760 female volunteers. Each volunteer completed a questionnaire and exclusion criteria were applied such that only 480 of these were considered normal subjects. The remaining 280 women failed to comply with the criteria and were considered 'abnormal'; their BMD results were analysed separately. Two abnormal subgroups, one with previous long bone fractures and one with radiologically diagnosed osteopenia, were studied. BMD values for femoral neck, Ward's triangle and trochanter were compared between the two femora in all the above groups. No dominance relationship was found when comparing left to right femur, averaged over any population studied, but large differences were found between the femora in individual volunteers. There was a high correlation between BMD in opposing femora of 0.91, 0.91 and 0.84 for the femoral neck, Ward's triangle and trochanter respectively. However, in normal subjects the percentage variation in these regions ranged up to 34%, 64% and 80% respectively at the different femoral sites. In addition, the normal population was divided into two subgroups, one in which the density difference between the femora was large, and the other in which the difference was statistically insignificant. The analytical and anatomical variations between these two groups were investigated. Only part of the difference appeared to be due to analytical problems and it seems that there is a genuine difference in femoral density. Poor correlation for femoral neck percentage density difference was found with average BMD, age, height and weight in the normal population.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1421794     DOI: 10.1007/bf01623182

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  6 in total

1.  In vivo and in vitro precision for bone density measured by dual-energy X-ray absorption.

Authors:  J Lilley; B G Walters; D A Heath; Z Drolc
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Which bone to measure?

Authors:  A G Need; B E Nordin
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 3.  Should perimenopausal women be screened for osteoporosis?

Authors:  S R Cummings; D Black
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Variation between femurs as measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA).

Authors:  M L Hall; J Heavens; P J Ell
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1991

5.  The symmetry of hip bone mineral density. A dual photon absorptiometry approach.

Authors:  H J Lessig; M S Meltzer; J A Siegel
Journal:  Clin Nucl Med       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 7.794

6.  Bone density of the radius, spine, and proximal femur in osteoporosis.

Authors:  R B Mazess; H Barden; M Ettinger; E Schultz
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 6.741

  6 in total
  10 in total

1.  Changes in bone mass and bone turnover following tibial shaft fracture.

Authors:  S W Veitch; S C Findlay; A J Hamer; A Blumsohn; Richard Eastell; B M Ingle
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  The prevalence of significant left-right differences in hip bone mineral density.

Authors:  R Hamdy; G M Kiebzak; E Seier; N B Watts
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-09-20       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Asymmetrical hip bone density in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Rebecca D Larson; Lesley J White
Journal:  Int J MS Care       Date:  2011

4.  Increased serum cartilage oligomeric matrix protein levels and decreased patellar bone mineral density in patients with chondromalacia patellae.

Authors:  E Murphy; O FitzGerald; T Saxne; B Bresnihan
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 19.103

5.  The diagnostic role of dual femur bone density measurement in low-impact fractures.

Authors:  Joseph C H Wong; Louise McEwan; Naomi Lee; Matthew R Griffiths; Nicholas A Pocock
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  The prevalence of significant left-right hip bone mineral density differences among black and white women.

Authors:  J D Alele; D L Kamen; K L Hermayer; J Fernandes; J Soule; M Ebeling; T C Hulsey
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-05-19       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Bilateral comparison of femoral bone density and hip axis length from single and fan beam DXA scans.

Authors:  K G Faulkner; H K Genant; M McClung
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 4.333

8.  Differences in bone mineral density between the right and left hips in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Hyun Jung Hwang; Si Young Park; Soon Hyuck Lee; Seung Bum Han; Kyung Han Ro
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2012-05-26       Impact factor: 2.153

9.  Prevalence of osteoporosis and osteopenia in an apparently healthy Indian population - a cross-sectional retrospective study.

Authors:  Neelam Kaushal; Divya Vohora; Rajinder K Jalali; Sujeet Jha
Journal:  Osteoporos Sarcopenia       Date:  2018-05-05

10.  Study of the variations of fall induced hip fracture risk between right and left femurs using CT-based FEA.

Authors:  Tanvir R Faisal; Yunhua Luo
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 2.819

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.