Literature DB >> 17821980

Rejection and redistribution of scattered radiation in scan equalization digital radiography (SEDR): simulation with spot images.

Xinming Liu1, Chris C Shaw.   

Abstract

The anti-scatter grid has been widely used to reject scatter and increase the perceptibility of a low-contrast object in chest radiography; however, it also attenuated the primary x-rays, resulting in a substantial loss of information and an increased relative noise level in heavily attenuated regions. A more dose efficient approach to scatter rejection is the slot-scan imaging technique. Another problem in chest radiography is the low transmitted x-ray intensity in heavily attenuating regions. It results in a higher relative noise level, thus limiting the contrast sensitivity. A solution to this problem is through the exposure equalization technique, with which the incident x-ray intensity is regionally modulated to compensate for the differences of x-ray attenuation due to the anatomic variation. We are in the process of implementing the scan equalization digital radiography (SEDR) technique, which combines the advantages of slot-scan imaging and exposure equalization. However, associated with the use of exposure equalization is a redistribution of scattered radiation at the detector, which may impact on the benefit of using exposure equalization in conjunction with the slot-scan imaging geometry. In order to understand the scatter properties and their impact in SEDR, we have used spot collimated digital radiographic images to synthesize simulated SEDR images with which scatter components, primary signals, and scatter-to-primary ratios (SPRs) were measured. It was shown that the anti-scatter grid rejected approximately 70% and 80% of scattered radiation in lightly and heavily attenuated regions, respectively, while the slot-scan method can reject as high as 95% (with 1 cm slot width) of scattered radiation without attenuation of the primary x-rays. Using a simple model for scatter effects, we have also estimated and compared the contrast-to-noise ratio degradation factors (CNRDFs, i.e., the fraction by which CNR is reduced). It was found that for quantum limited situations, the slot-scan technique has resulted in a substantial improvement of the image quality, as indicated by higher estimated CNRDFs (less scatter). An estimated improvement of 40%-50% in the lungs, 50%-90% in the mediastinum, and 60%-110% in the subdiaphragm was achieved with the slot-scan over the anti-scatter grid method. Compared to slot-scan imaging, SEDR resulted in higher SPRs in the lungs and lower SPRs in the mediastinum. In the subdiaphragmatic regions, the SPRs remain about the same. This corresponds to lower CNRDFs in the lungs, higher CNRDFs in the mediastinum, and about the same CNRDFs in the subdiaphragmatic regions. It was shown that although SEDR has resulted in minimum improvement over slot-scan imaging in reducing the SPRs, it could improve the contrast sensitivity by raising the primary signal levels in heavily attenuating regions. This advantage needs to be further investigated in our continuing study of the SEDR technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17821980      PMCID: PMC2841411          DOI: 10.1118/1.2739805

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  47 in total

1.  Full breast digital mammography with an amorphous silicon-based flat panel detector: physical characteristics of a clinical prototype.

Authors:  S Vedantham; A Karellas; S Suryanarayanan; D Albagli; S Han; E J Tkaczyk; C E Landberg; B Opsahl-Ong; P R Granfors; I Levis; C J D'Orsi; R E Hendrick
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  An edge spread technique for measurement of the scatter-to-primary ratio in mammography.

Authors:  V N Cooper; J M Boone; J A Seibert; C J Pellot-Barakat
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Area x-ray beam equalization for digital angiography.

Authors:  S Molloi; J Tang; T Mather; Y Zhou
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Imaging characteristics of an amorphous silicon flat-panel detector for digital chest radiography.

Authors:  C E Floyd; R J Warp; J T Dobbins; H G Chotas; A H Baydush; R Vargas-Voracek; C E Ravin
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Scatter/primary in mammography: comprehensive results.

Authors:  J M Boone; K K Lindfors; V N Cooper; J A Seibert
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Performance of a 41X41-cm2 amorphous silicon flat panel x-ray detector for radiographic imaging applications.

Authors:  P R Granfors; R Aufrichtig
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  A slot-scanned photodiode-array/CCD hybrid detector for digital mammography.

Authors:  James G Mainprize; Nancy L Ford; Shi Yin; Türmay Tümer; Martin J Yaffe
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Scatter/primary in mammography: Monte Carlo validation.

Authors:  J M Boone; V N Cooper
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Mammographic imaging with a small format CCD-based digital cassette: physical characteristics of a clinical system.

Authors:  S Vedantham; A Karellas; S Suryanarayanan; I Levis; M Sayag; R Kleehammer; R Heidsieck; C J D'Orsi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  DQE(f) of four generations of computed radiography acquisition devices.

Authors:  J T Dobbins; D L Ergun; L Rutz; D A Hinshaw; H Blume; D C Clark
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 4.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.