Literature DB >> 1774390

Bioimpedance versus thermodilution cardiac output measurement: the Bomed NCCOM3 after coronary bypass surgery.

A N Thomas1, J Ryan, B R Doran, B J Pollard.   

Abstract

Values obtained for cardiac output (CO) were compared using thermodilution (TD) with those obtained using bioimpedance (Bi) as measured using the Bomed NCCOM3 (Revision 6) in 28 consecutive patients in the first 24 h after coronary artery bypass surgery (CABS). In 46 paired measurements made in the first 12 h after CABS Bi values for CO were significantly lower than TD values, the limits of agreement between the two methods were also unacceptably large (mean Bi 4.38 (SD 1.40) l/min, mean TD 5.46 (SD 1.19) l/min, limits of agreement -3.05 to +0.89). In 55 paired measurements made after 12 h (all in spontaneously breathing patients) there was no significant difference between the two methods and acceptable limits of agreement, mean Bi 5.69 (SD 1.2) l/min mean TD 5.6 (SD 1.2) l/min, limits of agreement -0.99 to +1.17). The significantly lower BiCO values obtained in the first 12 h after CABS show that BiCO measurement is not consistently reliable in the intensive care setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1774390     DOI: 10.1007/bf01720674

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


  11 in total

1.  Noninvasive versus invasive assessment of cardiac output after cardiac surgery: clinical validation.

Authors:  D R Spahn; E R Schmid; M Tornic; R Jenni; L von Segesser; M Turina; A Baetscher
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Anesth       Date:  1990-02

2.  Non-invasive determination of cardiac output by Doppler echocardiography and electrical bioimpedance.

Authors:  D B Northridge; I N Findlay; J Wilson; E Henderson; H J Dargie
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1990-02

3.  Comparison of two impedance cardiographic techniques for measuring cardiac output in critically ill patients.

Authors:  R W Gotshall; V C Wood; D S Miles
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 7.598

4.  Transthoracic electrical bioimpedance versus thermodilution technique for cardiac output measurement during mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  J C Preiser; A Daper; J N Parquier; B Contempré; J L Vincent
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  A new stroke volume equation for thoracic electrical bioimpedance: theory and rationale.

Authors:  D P Bernstein
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 7.598

6.  Comparison of measurements of cardiac output by bioimpedance and thermodilution in severely ill surgical patients.

Authors:  P L Appel; H B Kram; J Mackabee; A W Fleming; W C Shoemaker
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 7.598

7.  Effects of intermittent positive-pressure ventilation on cardiac output measurements by thermodilution.

Authors:  K Okamoto; T Komatsu; V Kumar; V Sanchala; K Kubal; R Bhalodia; K Shibutani
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 7.598

8.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Comparison of bioimpedance and thermodilution methods for determining cardiac output: experimental and clinical studies.

Authors:  F G Spinale; H D Reines; F A Crawford
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 4.330

10.  Continuous noninvasive real-time monitoring of stroke volume and cardiac output by thoracic electrical bioimpedance.

Authors:  D P Bernstein
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 7.598

View more
  5 in total

1.  A meta-analysis of studies using bias and precision statistics to compare cardiac output measurement techniques.

Authors:  L A Critchley; J A Critchley
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Non-invasive cardiac output by transthoracic electrical bioimpedence in post-cardiac surgery patients: comparison with thermodilution method.

Authors:  Arunodaya R Gujjar; K Muralidhar; Sanjay Banakal; Ratan Gupta; Talakad N Sathyaprabha; P S Jairaj
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2008-04-17       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  Comparison of impedance cardiography and dye dilution method for measuring cardiac output.

Authors:  W Spiering; P N van Es; P W de Leeuw
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  The influence of weight on stroke volume determination by means of impedance cardiography in cardiac surgery patients.

Authors:  H H Woltjer; H J Bogaard; H I van der Spoel; P M de Vries
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 5.  Intensive care.

Authors:  S Sinclair; M Singer
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 2.401

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.