Literature DB >> 2752776

Comparison of two impedance cardiographic techniques for measuring cardiac output in critically ill patients.

R W Gotshall1, V C Wood, D S Miles.   

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to compare cardiac output (Q) values obtained by both the Kubicek (MIC) and Sramek (NCCOM3) impedance cardiographic techniques with thermodilution (TD) in critically ill patients. The two impedance techniques were also compared in normal subjects. Seven healthy subjects and ten ICU patients were enlisted in the study. Three Q measurements were made in each subject. In the ICU patients, there were no significant differences in Q values as measured by TD (6.6 L/min), MIC (6.3 L/min), and NCCOM3 (6.4 L/min). Both MIC and NCCOM3 Q values were comparable to TD in patients. In normals, however, the NCCOM3 estimated larger values for Q than did the MIC (NCCOM3, 9.2 L/min; MIC, 6.2 L/min). Q values obtained with MIC in normals were comparable with published values for supine normals. Thus, the two techniques agreed in the patients but not in the normals. The reasons for these results are not obvious from the data, but are attributable to the measurements by the NCCOM3. Because of this, caution is suggested when interpreting absolute Q values obtained by the NCCOM3.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2752776     DOI: 10.1097/00003246-198908000-00017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  14 in total

1.  A meta-analysis of studies using bias and precision statistics to compare cardiac output measurement techniques.

Authors:  L A Critchley; J A Critchley
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Non-invasive determination of cardiac output by Doppler echocardiography and electrical bioimpedance.

Authors: 
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1990-11

Review 3.  European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Expert panel: the use of the pulmonary artery catheter.

Authors: 
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Bioimpedance versus thermodilution cardiac output measurement: the Bomed NCCOM3 after coronary bypass surgery.

Authors:  A N Thomas; J Ryan; B R Doran; B J Pollard
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Comparison of impedance cardiography and dye dilution method for measuring cardiac output.

Authors:  W Spiering; P N van Es; P W de Leeuw
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 5.994

6.  A comparison of the haemodynamic effects of intrathecal meperidine, meperidine-bupivacaine mixture and hyperbaric bupivacaine.

Authors:  F Conway; L A Critchley; J C Stuart; R C Freebairn
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 5.063

7.  Treatment with isoproterenol of bupivacaine toxicity.

Authors:  P Lacombe; G Blaise; F Plante; C Hollmann
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 5.063

8.  Impedance cardiography. Importance of the equation and the electrode configuration.

Authors:  B J van der Meer; H H Woltjer; A M Sousman; W O Schreuder; E R Bulder; M A Huybregts; P M de Vries
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  Alfentanil controls the haemodynamic response during rapid-sequence induction of anaesthesia.

Authors:  R J Martineau; C P Tousignant; D R Miller; K A Hull
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 5.063

10.  Disagreement between standard transthoracic impedance cardiography and the automated transthoracic electrical bioimpedance method in estimating the cardiovascular responses to phenylephrine and isoprenaline in healthy man.

Authors:  C De Mey; D Enterling
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 4.335

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.