Literature DB >> 3355284

Comparison of bioimpedance and thermodilution methods for determining cardiac output: experimental and clinical studies.

F G Spinale1, H D Reines, F A Crawford.   

Abstract

The changes in electrical bioimpedance caused by the blood flow through a thoracic segment may be measured using a series of electrodes placed at opposing ends of this segment. Cardiac output (CO) is calculated by computer as the change in bioimpedance over time. This study was performed to determine the accuracy of bioimpedance CO (CObi) compared with standard thermodilution CO (COtd) in an animal model and in patients. COtd was determined using a thermodilution CO computer, and CObi was calculated with a bioimpedance computer in 10 dogs at baseline and at 5-minute intervals following the injection of 7 mEq of calcium chloride. A high correlation between COtd and CObi was observed (r = 0.91, p less than 0.001) over a range of 2.5 to 6 L/min. Thirty-three paired observations using the CObi and COtd methods were performed in 10 patients following elective coronary artery bypass surgery. A significant correlation between the two methods was determined with a CO range of 2.1 to 7.8 L/min (r = 0.77, p less than 0.001). CObi became inaccurate with severe tachycardia (pulse, 180/min), low CO, or frequent arrhythmias. These results indicate that this technique provides a continuous noninvasive method of determining CO that is comparable with thermodilution techniques. The technique of CObi holds promise for widespread use when continuous and noninvasive monitoring of CO is necessary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3355284     DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(98)90016-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  12 in total

1.  Evaluation of a new advanced thoracic bioimpedance device for estimation of cardiac output.

Authors:  D G Haryadi; D R Westenskow; L A Critchley; S I Schookin; V G Zubenko; K R Beliaev; A A Morozov
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Differential cardiovascular effects of propranolol, atenolol, and pindolol measured by impedance cardiography.

Authors:  S H Thomas; R C Cooper; M Ekwuru; S Fletcher; J Gilbody; T S Husseyin; M Ishaque; R Jagathesan; G Reddy; S E Smith
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.953

3.  Comparative effects of ivabradine, a selective heart rate-lowering agent, and propranolol on systemic and cardiac haemodynamics at rest and during exercise.

Authors:  Robinson Joannides; Nicholas Moore; Michaela Iacob; Patricia Compagnon; Guy Lerebours; Jean-François Menard; Christian Thuillez
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Bioimpedance versus thermodilution cardiac output measurement: the Bomed NCCOM3 after coronary bypass surgery.

Authors:  A N Thomas; J Ryan; B R Doran; B J Pollard
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Comparison of impedance cardiography and dye dilution method for measuring cardiac output.

Authors:  W Spiering; P N van Es; P W de Leeuw
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 5.994

6.  Impedance cardiography as a noninvasive technique for atrioventricular interval optimization in cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Martin U Braun; Andreas Schnabel; Thomas Rauwolf; Matthias Schulze; Ruth H Strasser
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.900

7.  Hemodynamic interactions between diuretics and calcium antagonists in the treatment of hypertensive patients.

Authors:  S Di Somma; V Liguori; M Petitto; G Cavallotti; S Savonitto; O de Divitiis
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 3.727

8.  Hemodynamic changes during laparoscopic cholecystectomy monitored with transesophageal echocardiography.

Authors:  D A Dorsay; F L Greene; C L Baysinger
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Impedance cardiography using the Sramek-Bernstein method: accuracy and variability at rest and during exercise.

Authors:  S H Thomas
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 4.335

10.  A comparison of two impedance cardiographs using head-up tilting and trend analysis.

Authors:  Lester A H Critchley; Ye Zhang; Julian A J H Critchley; Raymond C K Chung
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.502

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.