Literature DB >> 2131856

Noninvasive versus invasive assessment of cardiac output after cardiac surgery: clinical validation.

D R Spahn1, E R Schmid, M Tornic, R Jenni, L von Segesser, M Turina, A Baetscher.   

Abstract

The accuracy of noninvasive cardiac output (CO) measurement techniques, such as electrical bioimpedance (BIO), suprasternal continuous-wave Doppler (CWD), pulsed-wave Doppler (PWD), and transesophageal continuous-wave Doppler (TED) ultrasound has been variably judged in recent years. In addition, clinical comparisons are hampered by the fact that there is no generally accepted gold standard in CO measurement. After coronary artery bypass surgery in 25 patients, CO was simultaneously determined by invasive standard techniques (thermodilution [TD] and Fick methods) plus BIO, CWD, PWD, and TED. There was an excellent agreement found between TD and the Fick method (COF = 0.13 + 1.01.COTD; r = 0.96; n = 99). Thermodilution was thus chosen to be the reference method. Bioimpedance underestimated COTD (COBIO = 0.47 + 0.60.COTD; r = 0.78; n = 111). Allowing physiological ejection times only led to an improved agreement between BIO and TD (COBIO = 0.05 + 0.69.COTD; r = 0.82; n = 79), but BIO still significantly underestimated COTD (P less than 0.0005). Using physiologic ejection times during COCWD determination reduced the scatter of data as compared with TD; however, CWD still considerably overestimated COTD, when COCWD computation was based on the echocardiographic aortic diameter (ECHO) (COCWD ECHO = 0.79 + 1.40.COTD; r = 0.84; n = 52). With the surgical aortic diameter (SURG), the agreement improved (COCWD SURG = 0.75 + 1.16.COTD; r = 0.89; n = 44), but overestimation of COTD remained significant (P less than 0.05). Irrespective of the aortic diameter, COPWD values showed a considerable scatter of data compared with COTD (COPWD ECHO = 1.26 + 0.60.COTD; r = 0.62; n = 64 and COPWD SURG = 1.42 + 0.41.COTD; r = 0.47; n = 61). Correlation of absolute COTED values to thermodilution depended on the method used for calibration. All investigated noninvasive CO measurement techniques unreliably measured relative CO changes. Despite its invasiveness, TD remains the method of choice for accurate CO determination in adult patients following cardiac surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2131856     DOI: 10.1016/0888-6296(90)90447-n

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiothorac Anesth        ISSN: 0888-6296


  8 in total

1.  The influence of left lateral position on cardiac output changes after head up tilt measured by impedance cardiography.

Authors:  M Kamenik
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 2.  Transesophageal Doppler devices: A technical review.

Authors:  Patrick Schober; Stephan A Loer; Lothar A Schwarte
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2009-10-20       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  Bioimpedance versus thermodilution cardiac output measurement: the Bomed NCCOM3 after coronary bypass surgery.

Authors:  A N Thomas; J Ryan; B R Doran; B J Pollard
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Comparison of impedance cardiography and dye dilution method for measuring cardiac output.

Authors:  W Spiering; P N van Es; P W de Leeuw
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 5.  Methods in pharmacology: measurement of cardiac output.

Authors:  Bart F Geerts; Leon P Aarts; Jos R Jansen
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.335

6.  Training is required to improve the reliability of esophageal Doppler to measure cardiac output in critically ill patients.

Authors:  J Y Lefrant; P Bruelle; A G Aya; G Saïssi; M Dauzat; J E de La Coussaye; J J Eledjam
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  Accuracy of cardiac output measurements during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: according to the vessel anastomosis sites.

Authors:  Sung Yong Park; Dae Hee Kim; Han Bum Joe; Ji Young Yoo; Jin Soo Kim; Min Kang; Yong Woo Hong
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2012-05-24

Review 8.  Cardiac output monitoring by echocardiography: should we pass on Swan-Ganz catheters?

Authors:  A C Perrino
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  1993 Sep-Oct
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.