Literature DB >> 2317415

Non-invasive determination of cardiac output by Doppler echocardiography and electrical bioimpedance.

D B Northridge1, I N Findlay, J Wilson, E Henderson, H J Dargie.   

Abstract

Cardiac output measured by thermodilution in 25 patients within 24 hours of acute myocardial infarction was compared with cardiac output measured by Doppler echocardiography (24 patients) and electrical bioimpedance (25 patients). The mean (range) cardiac outputs measured by Doppler (4.03 (2.2-6.0) 1/min) and electrical bioimpedance (3.79 (1.1-6.2) 1/min) were similar to the mean thermodilution value (3.95 (2.1-6.2) 1/min). Both non-invasive techniques agreed closely with thermodilution in most patients. None the less, three results with each method disagreed with thermodilution by more than 1 1/min. Both non-invasive techniques were reproducible and accurate in most patients with acute myocardial infarction. Doppler echocardiography was time consuming and technically demanding. Electrical bioimpedance was simple to use and had the additional advantage of allowing continuous monitoring of the cardiac output.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2317415      PMCID: PMC1024333          DOI: 10.1136/hrt.63.2.93

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Heart J        ISSN: 0007-0769


  21 in total

1.  Multicomponent noninvasive physiologic monitoring of circulatory function.

Authors:  W C Shoemaker; P L Appel; H B Kram; R C Nathan; J L Thompson
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 7.598

2.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Automated non-invasive measurement of cardiac output: comparison of electrical bioimpedance and carbon dioxide rebreathing techniques.

Authors:  S A Smith; A E Russell; M J West; J Chalmers
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1988-03

4.  Stroke distance--an improved measure of cardiovascular function?

Authors:  D G Gibson
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1985-02

5.  Feasibility and variability of six methods for the echocardiographic and Doppler determination of cardiac output.

Authors:  G L Nicolosi; E Pungercic; E Cervesato; D Pavan; L Modena; E Moro; V Dall'Aglio; D Zanuttini
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1988-03

6.  Validation of a Doppler technique for beat-to-beat measurement of cardiac output.

Authors:  N Mehta; V I Iyawe; A R Cummin; S Bayley; K B Saunders; E D Bennett
Journal:  Clin Sci (Lond)       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 6.124

7.  Measurement of left ventricular stroke volume using continuous wave Doppler echocardiography of the ascending aorta and M-mode echocardiography of the aortic valve.

Authors:  A Bouchard; S Blumlein; N B Schiller; S Schlitt; B F Byrd; T Ports; K Chatterjee
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Cardiac stroke volume during exercise measured by Doppler echocardiography: comparison with the thermodilution technique and evaluation of reproducibility.

Authors:  H Ihlen; K Endresen; S Golf; S Nitter-Hauge
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1987-11

9.  Impaired left ventricular function in acute myocardial infarction assessed by Doppler measurement of ascending aortic blood velocity and maximum acceleration.

Authors:  N Mehta; D E Bennett
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1986-05-01       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  Assessment of cardiac output by the Doppler ultrasound technique alone.

Authors:  N E Haites; F M McLennan; D H Mowat; J M Rawles
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1985-02
View more
  28 in total

1.  Changes in the derived central pressure waveform and pulse pressure in response to angiotensin II and noradrenaline in man.

Authors:  I B Wilkinson; H MacCallum; P C Hupperetz; C J van Thoor ; J R Cockcroft; D J Webb
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2001-02-01       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  A meta-analysis of studies using bias and precision statistics to compare cardiac output measurement techniques.

Authors:  L A Critchley; J A Critchley
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  Agreement and reproducibility of the estimates of cardiovascular function by impedance cardiography and M-mode echocardiography in healthy subjects.

Authors:  C de Mey; J Matthews; R Butzer; V Schroeter; G G Belz
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Differential cardiovascular effects of propranolol, atenolol, and pindolol measured by impedance cardiography.

Authors:  S H Thomas; R C Cooper; M Ekwuru; S Fletcher; J Gilbody; T S Husseyin; M Ishaque; R Jagathesan; G Reddy; S E Smith
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.953

5.  The cardiovascular effects of oral nifedipine and nicardipine: a double-blind comparison in healthy volunteers using transthoracic bioimpedance cardiography.

Authors:  S H Thomas; P Molyneux; J Kelly; S E Smith
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.953

6.  Comparative effects of ivabradine, a selective heart rate-lowering agent, and propranolol on systemic and cardiac haemodynamics at rest and during exercise.

Authors:  Robinson Joannides; Nicholas Moore; Michaela Iacob; Patricia Compagnon; Guy Lerebours; Jean-François Menard; Christian Thuillez
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.335

7.  Value of a modified continuity equation method to quantify mitral valve area in patients with mitral stenosis and sinus rhythm.

Authors:  W Voelker; B Regele; H Dittmann; M Schmid; M Mauser; V Kühlkamp; K R Karsch
Journal:  Klin Wochenschr       Date:  1991-12-11

8.  Comparison and reproducibility of transthoracic bioimpedance and dual beam Doppler ultrasound measurement of cardiac function in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  H W Ng; T Walley; Y Tsao; A M Breckenridge
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 4.335

9.  Comparative effects of glyceryl trinitrate and amyl nitrite on pulse wave reflection and augmentation index.

Authors:  Lynn D Greig; Stephen J Leslie; Fraser W Gibb; Sherilyn Tan; David E Newby; David J Webb
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.335

10.  Disagreement between standard transthoracic impedance cardiography and the automated transthoracic electrical bioimpedance method in estimating the cardiovascular responses to phenylephrine and isoprenaline in healthy man.

Authors:  C De Mey; D Enterling
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 4.335

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.