Literature DB >> 3769504

Comparison of measurements of cardiac output by bioimpedance and thermodilution in severely ill surgical patients.

P L Appel, H B Kram, J Mackabee, A W Fleming, W C Shoemaker.   

Abstract

In order to evaluate a new thoracic electrical bioimpedance (TEB) system for measurement of stroke volume based on the Sramek-Bernstein equation, 391 paired values of cardiac output were measured simultaneously with the standard thermodilution method. These values were obtained from 16 patients selected for having the most severe illness during a 6-month period; the intent was to evaluate the bioimpedance method in the worst possible situations. The correlation coefficient (r) was 0.83, slope was 0.87, intercept was 1.53, and the mean difference between the two methods was 16.2 +/- 11.8 (SD)% in the total series. In 285 paired samples where satisfactory conditions were met, r was 0.90, slope was 0.98, intercept was 0.34, and the mean difference was 11.8 +/- 8.9%. The data indicate satisfactory correlations between these two methods. When the TEB waveform is satisfactory, the agreement between TEB and thermodilution is as good as the agreement between serial thermodilution methods. Difficulties may arise with dysrhythmias, tachycardia (heart rate greater than 150 beat/min), metal in the chest or chest wall, sepsis, hypertension, and extremely oily skin. Mechanical ventilation did not appear to be a problem.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3769504     DOI: 10.1097/00003246-198611000-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  35 in total

1.  Differential cardiovascular effects of propranolol, atenolol, and pindolol measured by impedance cardiography.

Authors:  S H Thomas; R C Cooper; M Ekwuru; S Fletcher; J Gilbody; T S Husseyin; M Ishaque; R Jagathesan; G Reddy; S E Smith
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.953

2.  The cardiovascular effects of oral nifedipine and nicardipine: a double-blind comparison in healthy volunteers using transthoracic bioimpedance cardiography.

Authors:  S H Thomas; P Molyneux; J Kelly; S E Smith
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.953

3.  Non-invasive determination of cardiac output by Doppler echocardiography and electrical bioimpedance.

Authors: 
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1990-11

4.  Non-invasive cardiac output by transthoracic electrical bioimpedence in post-cardiac surgery patients: comparison with thermodilution method.

Authors:  Arunodaya R Gujjar; K Muralidhar; Sanjay Banakal; Ratan Gupta; Talakad N Sathyaprabha; P S Jairaj
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2008-04-17       Impact factor: 2.502

5.  Comparison and reproducibility of transthoracic bioimpedance and dual beam Doppler ultrasound measurement of cardiac function in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  H W Ng; T Walley; Y Tsao; A M Breckenridge
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 4.335

6.  Bioimpedance versus thermodilution cardiac output measurement: the Bomed NCCOM3 after coronary bypass surgery.

Authors:  A N Thomas; J Ryan; B R Doran; B J Pollard
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  Comparison of impedance cardiography and dye dilution method for measuring cardiac output.

Authors:  W Spiering; P N van Es; P W de Leeuw
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 8.  Cardiac output in 1998.

Authors:  M Singer
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 5.994

9.  Mesenteric, coeliac and splanchnic blood flow in humans during exercise.

Authors:  M J Perko; H B Nielsen; C Skak; J O Clemmesen; T V Schroeder; N H Secher
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1998-12-15       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Aortocaval compression in the sitting and lateral decubitus positions during extradural catheter placement in the parturient.

Authors:  P J Andrews; W E Ackerman; M M Juneja
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 5.063

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.