Literature DB >> 1984126

The impact of nonclinical factors on repeat cesarean section.

R S Stafford1.   

Abstract

Nonclinical factors, including the setting in which health care takes place, influence clinical decisions. This research measures the independent effects of organizational and socioeconomic factors on repeat cesarean section use in California. Of 45,425 births to women with previous cesarean sections in 1986, vaginal birth after cesarean section occurred in 10.9%. Sizable nonclinical variations were noted. By hospital ownership, rates ranged from 4.9% (for-profit hospitals) to 29.2% (University of California). Variations also existed by hospital teaching level (nonteaching hospitals, 7.0%, vs formalized teaching hospitals, 23.3%); payment source (private insurance, 8.1%, vs indigent services, 25.2%); and obstetric volume (low-volume hospitals, 5.4%, vs high-volume hospitals, 16.6%). Multiple logistic regression demonstrated that these variables had independent effects after accounting for their overlapping influences and the effects of patient characteristics. The observed variations demonstrate the prominence of nonclinical factors in decision making and question the clinical appropriateness of current practice patterns.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1984126

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  21 in total

1.  Provider distribution and variations in statewide cesarean section rates.

Authors:  W J Hueston; S Lewis-Stevenson
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2001-02

2.  [Differences in the likelihood of caesareans, associated with dependency on hospitals, the volume of cases and the obstetric risk].

Authors:  A Sarría-Santamera; E T López-Madurga
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2003-10-15       Impact factor: 1.137

3.  Explaining source of payment differences in U.S. cesarean rates: why do privately insured mothers receive more cesareans than mothers who are not privately insured?

Authors:  Darren Grant
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2005-02

4.  The UTAH VBAC Study.

Authors:  Greg Gochnour; Stephen Ratcliffe; Mary Bishop Stone
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2005-06

5.  Cesarean section rates in Italy by hospital payment mode: an analysis based on birth certificates.

Authors:  R Bertollini; D DiLallo; T Spadea; C Perucci
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Adjusting cesarean delivery rates for case mix.

Authors:  E B Keeler; R E Park; R M Bell; D S Gifford; J Keesey
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Predictors of cesarean section delivery among college-educated black and white women, Davidson County, Tennessee, 1990-1994.

Authors:  A O Scott-Wright; T M Flanagan; R M Wrona
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 1.798

8.  Effect of nonmedical factors on family physicians' decisions about referral for consultation.

Authors:  G R Langley; A M MacLellan; H J Sutherland; J E Till
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1992-09-01       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  Cesarean section: analysis of the experience before and after the National Consensus Conference on Aspects of Cesarean Birth.

Authors:  S R Soliman; R F Burrows
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1993-04-15       Impact factor: 8.262

10.  Factors influencing the practice of vaginal birth after cesarean section.

Authors:  G Goldman; R Pineault; L Potvin; R Blais; H Bilodeau
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 9.308

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.