Literature DB >> 2360593

The Green Bay cesarean section study. I. The physician factor as a determinant of cesarean birth rates.

R K DeMott1, H F Sandmire.   

Abstract

This study was designed to identify the determinants of cesarean birth rates. The study population included all 1030 cesarean deliveries performed on singleton pregnancies by 11 obstetricians practicing at two Green Bay hospitals from 1986 through 1988; 1076 control patients with vaginal deliveries were selected for comparison purposes. The 1030 cesarean deliveries represented 14% of the 7335 singleton deliveries that occurred during the study period. Individual physician cesarean rates ranged from 5.6% to 19.7%. Cesarean rates for physician groups ranged from 9.8% to 18%. The variances in cesarean rates among individual and groups of physicians were not attributable to patient obstetric risk factors, socioeconomic status, service status, or duration of the physician's practice. Higher cesarean rates did not result in better neonatal outcome. Individual physician practice style was the only apparent determinant of cesarean rates for the 11 obstetricians. Current cesarean rates can be substantially reduced without sacrificing fetal and newborn safety.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2360593     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(90)90925-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  9 in total

1.  Beyond the simple economics of cesarean section birthing: women's resistance to social inequality.

Authors:  Dominique P Béhague
Journal:  Cult Med Psychiatry       Date:  2002-12

2.  Explaining source of payment differences in U.S. cesarean rates: why do privately insured mothers receive more cesareans than mothers who are not privately insured?

Authors:  Darren Grant
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2005-02

3.  Cesarean section rates in Italy by hospital payment mode: an analysis based on birth certificates.

Authors:  R Bertollini; D DiLallo; T Spadea; C Perucci
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Predictors of neonatal encephalopathy in full-term infants.

Authors:  S J Adamson; L M Alessandri; N Badawi; P R Burton; P J Pemberton; F Stanley
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-09-02

5.  Racial/ethnic differences in the likelihood of cesarean delivery, California.

Authors:  P Braveman; S Egerter; F Edmonston; M Verdon
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Medical and non-medical reasons for cesarean section delivery in Egypt: a hospital-based retrospective study.

Authors:  Shatha Elnakib; Nahla Abdel-Tawab; Doaa Orbay; Nevine Hassanein
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  Hospital differences in cesarean deliveries in Massachusetts (US) 2004-2006: the case against case-mix artifact.

Authors:  Isabel A Cáceres; Mariana Arcaya; Eugene Declercq; Candice M Belanoff; Vanitha Janakiraman; Bruce Cohen; Jeffrey Ecker; Lauren A Smith; S V Subramanian
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-18       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Factors associated with cesarean delivery rates: a single-institution experience.

Authors:  Spencer McClelland; Naomi Gorfinkle; Alan A Arslan; Maria Teresa Benedetto-Anzai; Teresa Cheon; Yuzuru Anzai
Journal:  Matern Health Neonatol Perinatol       Date:  2017-04-21

9.  Modeling physician variability to prioritize relevant medical record information.

Authors:  Mohammadamin Tajgardoon; Gregory F Cooper; Andrew J King; Gilles Clermont; Harry Hochheiser; Milos Hauskrecht; Dean F Sittig; Shyam Visweswaran
Journal:  JAMIA Open       Date:  2020-12-31
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.