Literature DB >> 7733420

Racial/ethnic differences in the likelihood of cesarean delivery, California.

P Braveman1, S Egerter, F Edmonston, M Verdon.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine whether women's sociodemographic characteristics are independently associated with cesarean delivery.
METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of hospital discharge data for singleton first births in California in 1991.
RESULTS: After insurance and personal, community, medical, and hospital characteristics had been controlled, Blacks were 24% more likely to undergo cesarean delivery than Whites; only among low-birthweight and county hospital births were Blacks not at a significantly elevated risk. Among women who resided in substantially non-English-speaking communities, who delivered high-birthweight babies, or who gave birth at for-profit hospitals, cesarean delivery appeared to be more likely among non-Whites and was over 40% more likely among Blacks than among Whites.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings cannot establish causation, but the significant racial/ethnic disparities in delivery mode, despite adjustment for social, economic, medical, and hospital factors, suggest inappropriate influences on clinical decision making that would not be addressed by changes in reimbursement. If practice variations among providers are involved, de facto racial differences in access to optimal care may be indicated. The role of provider and patient attitudes and expectations in the observed racial/ethnic differentials should also be explored.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7733420      PMCID: PMC1615415          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.85.5.625

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  34 in total

1.  Cesarean section rates in Italy by hospital payment mode: an analysis based on birth certificates.

Authors:  R Bertollini; D DiLallo; T Spadea; C Perucci
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Income, race, and surgery in Maryland.

Authors:  A M Gittelsohn; J Halpern; R L Sanchez
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Factors associated with hospital-specific cesarean birth rates.

Authors:  E R Newton; C S Higgins
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 0.142

4.  Recent patterns in cesarean delivery in the United States.

Authors:  P J Placek; S M Taffel
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 2.844

5.  Continuous emotional support during labor in a US hospital. A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  J Kennell; M Klaus; S McGrath; S Robertson; C Hinkley
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1991-05-01       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  The impact of nonclinical factors on repeat cesarean section.

Authors:  R S Stafford
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1991-01-02       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  The Green Bay cesarean section study. I. The physician factor as a determinant of cesarean birth rates.

Authors:  R K DeMott; H F Sandmire
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Cesarean section use and source of payment: an analysis of California hospital discharge abstracts.

Authors:  R S Stafford
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Socioeconomic differences in rates of cesarean section.

Authors:  J B Gould; B Davey; R S Stafford
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1989-07-27       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Racial inequalities in the use of procedures for patients with ischemic heart disease in Massachusetts.

Authors:  M B Wenneker; A M Epstein
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1989-01-13       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  35 in total

1.  Defending diversity: affirmative action and medical education.

Authors:  K DeVille
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Risk-adjusted primary cesarean delivery rates for managed care plans in New York State, 1998.

Authors:  P J Roohan; R E Josberger; F C Gesten
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2001-09

3.  Race, medicine, and health care in the United States: a historical survey.

Authors:  W M Byrd; L A Clayton
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.798

4.  An approach to studying social disparities in health and health care.

Authors:  Paula A Braveman; Susan A Egerter; Catherine Cubbin; Kristen S Marchi
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Explaining source of payment differences in U.S. cesarean rates: why do privately insured mothers receive more cesareans than mothers who are not privately insured?

Authors:  Darren Grant
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2005-02

6.  Association of acculturation with cesarean section among Latinas.

Authors:  Amy I Zlot; Debra J Jackson; Carol Korenbrot
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2005-03

7.  Impact of a cultural belief about ghost month on delivery mode in Taiwan.

Authors:  Herng-Ching Lin; Sudha Xirasagar; Yu-Chi Tung
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.710

8.  Differences in the effect of patients' socioeconomic status on the use of invasive cardiovascular procedures across health insurance categories.

Authors:  D M Carlisle; B D Leake
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Adjusting cesarean delivery rates for case mix.

Authors:  E B Keeler; R E Park; R M Bell; D S Gifford; J Keesey
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.402

10.  Caesarian sections in Guadalajara, Mexico: sociodemographic risk factors.

Authors:  G J Gonzalez-Perez; M G Vega-Lopez
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 3.710

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.