Literature DB >> 14572406

[Differences in the likelihood of caesareans, associated with dependency on hospitals, the volume of cases and the obstetric risk].

A Sarría-Santamera, E T López-Madurga.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14572406      PMCID: PMC7684348          DOI: 10.1016/s0212-6567(03)79303-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aten Primaria        ISSN: 0212-6567            Impact factor:   1.137


× No keyword cloud information.
  10 in total

1.  Inter-hospital variations in caesarean sections. A risk adjusted comparison in the Valencia public hospitals.

Authors:  J Librero; S Peiró; S M Calderón
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  Cesarean deliveries for medicaid patients: a comparison in public and private hospitals in Los Angeles county.

Authors:  K D Gregory; E Ramicone; L Chan; K L Kahn
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Cesarean section rates in Italy by hospital payment mode: an analysis based on birth certificates.

Authors:  R Bertollini; D DiLallo; T Spadea; C Perucci
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Using ICD-9 codes to identify indications for primary and repeat cesarean sections: agreement with clinical records.

Authors:  O A Henry; K D Gregory; C J Hobel; L D Platt
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Effect of epidural analgesia for labor on the cesarean delivery rate.

Authors:  S C Morton; M S Williams; E B Keeler; J C Gambone; K L Kahn
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  [Evolution of cesarean section rates in Spain: 1984-1988].

Authors:  A Sarría Santamera; J M Sendra Gutiérrez
Journal:  Gac Sanit       Date:  1994 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.139

7.  Rates for obstetric intervention among private and public patients in Australia: population based descriptive study.

Authors:  C L Roberts; S Tracy; B Peat
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-07-15

8.  Lack of progress in labor as a reason for cesarean.

Authors:  D S Gifford; S C Morton; M Fiske; J Keesey; E Keeler; K L Kahn
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  The impact of nonclinical factors on repeat cesarean section.

Authors:  R S Stafford
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1991-01-02       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Uncertain value of electronic fetal monitoring in predicting cerebral palsy.

Authors:  K B Nelson; J M Dambrosia; T Y Ting; J K Grether
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-03-07       Impact factor: 91.245

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.