Literature DB >> 17324173

Cesarean delivery among nulliparous women in Beirut: assessing predictors in nine hospitals.

Hala Tamim1, Souheil Y El-Chemaly, Anwar H Nassar, Alia M Aaraj, Oona M R Campbell, Afamia A Kaddour, Khalid A Yunis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Obstetric practice has witnessed a worldwide trend of increasing cesarean section rates in recent years. Similar trends have been observed in Lebanon, according to 2 studies conducted in 1996 and 1999. The objective of the present study was to assess the differences in predictors of cesarean delivery among nulliparous women in a "control hospital" with a low cesarean delivery rate (12.5%) and the rest of the National Collaborative Perinatal Neonatal Network (NCPNN) "study hospitals" with a higher cesarean delivery rate (31.4%).
METHODS: Data were collected by the NCPNN database, which covers deliveries at 9 major hospitals located in the Greater Beirut area. Data analysis was performed on the 6,668 consecutive deliveries occurring between January 1, 2001, and December 31, 2002, at the NCPNN participating centers. The questionnaires included items that cover parental sociodemographic characteristics and maternal and newborn health characteristics. Sources of data included direct interviews with mothers after delivery and before hospital discharge and reviews of obstetric and nursery medical charts. Chi-square tests and t tests were performed for categorical and continuous clinical predictors of cesarean section. Logistic regression was performed to determine the odds of having a cesarean section for the study hospitals when compared with the control hospital. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals are reported.
RESULTS: Variables in the study hospitals that correlated with a higher cesarean delivery rate were male obstetricians, day of the week, and mode of payment compared with the control hospital.
CONCLUSIONS: In a country with a high cesarean section rate, 1 hospital met World Health Organization criteria for acceptable cesarean section rates, with no compromise in neonatal outcome. Further studies are needed to investigate potential policies to decrease the high cesarean section rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17324173      PMCID: PMC1913632          DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2006.00141.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Birth        ISSN: 0730-7659            Impact factor:   3.689


  21 in total

1.  Advanced maternal age as a risk factor for cesarean delivery.

Authors:  D Gordon; J Milberg; J Daling; D Hickok
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Cesarean section rates in Italy by hospital payment mode: an analysis based on birth certificates.

Authors:  R Bertollini; D DiLallo; T Spadea; C Perucci
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 3.  Cesarean birth: how to reduce the rate.

Authors:  R H Paul; D A Miller
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Pregnancy outcomes in women of very advanced maternal age.

Authors:  Leonie K Callaway; Karin Lust; H David McIntyre
Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.100

5.  Births: preliminary data for 2004.

Authors:  Brady E Hamilton; Joyce A Martin; Stephanie J Ventura; Paul D Sutton; Fay Menacker
Journal:  Natl Vital Stat Rep       Date:  2005-12-29

6.  Epidemic of caesarean sections in Brazil.

Authors:  F C Barros; J P Vaughan; C G Victora; S R Huttly
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1991-07-20       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Variation in cesarean section rates among hospitals in Washington State.

Authors:  L McKenzie; P A Stephenson
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Determinants of term intrauterine growth retardation: the Saudi experience.

Authors:  Y A al-Eissa; H S Ba'Aqeel; K N Haque; A M AboBakr; T M al-Kharfy; T Y Khashoggi; M A al-Husain
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 1.862

9.  The impact of nonclinical factors on repeat cesarean section.

Authors:  R S Stafford
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1991-01-02       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Socioeconomic differences in rates of cesarean section.

Authors:  J B Gould; B Davey; R S Stafford
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1989-07-27       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  5 in total

1.  The safety and quality of childbirth in the context of health systems: mapping maternal health provision in Lebanon.

Authors:  Jocelyn DeJong; Chaza Akik; Faysal El Kak; Hibah Osman; Fadi El-Jardali
Journal:  Midwifery       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 2.372

2.  Determinants of exclusive breastfeeding in an urban population of primiparas in Lebanon: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Haya Hamade; Monique Chaaya; Matilda Saliba; Rawan Chaaban; Hibah Osman
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 3.295

3.  Effect of Social Factors on Cesarean Birth in Primiparous Women: A Cross Sectional Study (Social Factors and Cesarean Birth).

Authors:  Can Oner; Binali Catak; Sevinç Sütlü; Selçuk Kilinç
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.429

4.  Cesarean section deliveries in the occupied Palestinian territory (oPt): an analysis of the 2006 Palestinian Family Health Survey.

Authors:  Hanan F Abdul-Rahim; Niveen Mohammad Elias Abu-Rmeileh; Laura Wick
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  2009-08-11       Impact factor: 2.980

5.  Cesarean sections among Syrian refugees in Lebanon from december 2012/january 2013 to june 2013: probable causes and recommendations.

Authors:  Karin M J Huster; Njogu Patterson; Marian Schilperoord; Paul Spiegel
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  2014-09-03
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.