Literature DB >> 17361444

["Cutting out" in pertrochanteric fractures--problem of osteoporosis?].

F Bonnaire1, A Weber, O Bösl, C Eckhardt, K Schwieger, B Linke.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite the use of intramedullary fixation devices for the stabilisation of intertrochanteric fractures, the rate of complications is still high. One of the main reasons for burdensome reinterventions in 9-15% of cases is the cutting out of the fixation device through both the spongious bone and the cortical bone at the apex of the femoral head. This phenomenon is strongly connected to the reduction of the fractures achieved, the technical performance of the operation with optimal implant positioning and the resistance of the trabecular bone in the femoral head against deformation by the fixation device. The latter is very low in cases of severe osteoporosis. To prevent the complication of cutting out, it seems sensible to find the limits of load-bearing capacity of individual osteoporosis-associated features (i.e. bone mineral density) at which special additional measures or other techniques for the treatment of these patients are desired.
METHODS: In a first step a new biomechanical standard test for implants stabilizing unstable trochanteric fractures was developed, which would provide predictable results depending on bone mineral density. In a second step a cut-off limit was sought for the bone density in the proximal femur that would afford stable fixation as measured by QCT (quantitative computed tomography) and DEXA (dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry).
RESULTS: The developed test is realistic; it can be used to study typical cutting out phenomena on cadaver femora. In an unstable fracture model (type A 2.3 of the AO classification), the implants DHS with TSP, PFN and TGN showed a stable long-term load-bearing capacity at a bone mineral density of >0.6 g/cm3. In 5 of 32 specimens a cutting out phenomenon could be demonstrated, in 4 cases if the bone mineral density of the proximal femur was below 0.6 g/cm3 as measured by DEXA, and in one case poor performance of the implant (short screw in the femoral head) was evident.
CONCLUSIONS: In cases of bone density of >0.6 g/cm3 in the proximal femur (DEXA), the standard implants for the fixation of unstable trochanteric fractures could guarantee fixation without cutting out. The critical value of sufficient bone density in our few cases seems to be around 0.6 g/cm3 as measured by DEXA. Further investigation is needed to define the limits of bone mineral density for a successful osteosynthesis. An appropriate augmentation of the trabecular bone of the femoral head or a new design of the central loading device could increase the load-bearing capacity and thus help to reduce the cutting out phenomenon. Another alternative could be the primary implantation of an endoprosthesis in the treatment of these patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17361444     DOI: 10.1007/s00113-007-1248-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Unfallchirurg        ISSN: 0177-5537            Impact factor:   1.000


  22 in total

1.  Proximal femoral bone density and its correlation to fracture load and hip-screw penetration load.

Authors:  M D Smith; D D Cody; S A Goldstein; A M Cooperman; L S Matthews; M J Flynn
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Failure of femoral head fixation: a cadaveric analysis of lag screw cut-out with the gamma locking nail and AO dynamic hip screw.

Authors:  R C Haynes; R G Pöll; A W Miles; R B Weston
Journal:  Injury       Date:  1997 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 2.586

3.  The use of quantitative computed tomography to estimate risk of fracture of the hip from falls.

Authors:  J C Lotz; W C Hayes
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Internal fixation for displaced fractures of the femoral neck. Does bone density affect clinical outcome?

Authors:  M J Heetveld; E L F B Raaymakers; B L van Eck-Smit; A D P van Walsum; J S K Luitse
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2005-03

5.  [Improvement in the primary stability of the dynamic hip screw osteosynthesis in unstable, pertrochanteric femoral fractures of osteoporotic bones by a new glass ionomer cement].

Authors:  L Claes; C Becker; M Simnacher; I Hoellen
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 6.  Treatment strategies for proximal femur fractures in osteoporotic patients.

Authors:  Felix Bonnaire; Henry Zenker; Christoph Lill; Andreas T Weber; Berend Linke
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-10-16       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  [Experimental examination for optimized stabilisation of trochanteric femur fractures, intra- or extramedullary implant localisation and influence of femur neck component profile on cut-out risk].

Authors:  W Friedl; J Clausen
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 0.955

8.  Bone density at various sites for prediction of hip fractures. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group.

Authors:  S R Cummings; D M Black; M C Nevitt; W Browner; J Cauley; K Ensrud; H K Genant; L Palermo; J Scott; T M Vogt
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-01-09       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  The effect of adjunctive methylmethacrylate on failures of fixation and function in patients with intertrochanteric fractures and osteoporosis.

Authors:  E J Bartucci; M H Gonzalez; D R Cooperman; H I Freedberg; R Barmada; G S Laros
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  A randomized study of the compression hip screw and Gamma nail in 426 fractures.

Authors:  Leif Ahrengart; Hans Törnkvist; Per Fornander; Karl-Göran Thorngren; Lauri Pasanen; Per Wahlström; Seppo Honkonen; Urban Lindgren
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  34 in total

1.  Is the rotation of the femoral head a potential initiation for cutting out? A theoretical and experimental approach.

Authors:  Andreas Lenich; Samuel Bachmeier; Lukas Prantl; Michael Nerlich; Jochen Hammer; Edgar Mayr; Amir Andreas Al-Munajjed; Bernd Füchtmeier
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2011-04-22       Impact factor: 2.362

2.  [Treatment results after cemented hemiprosthesis for care of unstable pertrochanteric femoral fractures in the elderly].

Authors:  S Grote; F Stegmeyer; V Bogner; P Biberthaler; W Mutschler
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 3.  [Complication management in implant dislocation].

Authors:  A Lenich; S Siebenlist; A B Imhoff
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 0.955

4.  Cement augmentation of the proximal femur nail antirotation: is it safe?

Authors:  Konrad Schuetze; S Ehinger; A Eickhoff; C Dehner; F Gebhard; P H Richter
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-07-25       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 5.  [Pertrochanteric femoral fractures in the elderly].

Authors:  G H Sandmann; P Biberthaler
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.000

6.  How to prevent cut-out and cut-through in biaxial proximal femoral nails: is there anything beyond lag screw positioning and tip-apex distance?

Authors:  Birgit Zirngibl; Roland Biber; Hermann Josef Bail
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  A novel method for intraoperative osseomechanical strength measurements: a biomechanical ex vivo evaluation on proximal femora.

Authors:  Alexander Maslaris; Olaf Brinkmann; Frank Layher; Georg Matziolis; Matthias Bungartz
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 8.  [Osteoporotic fractures of the proximal femur. What's new?].

Authors:  F Bonnaire; C Straßberger; M Kieb; P Bula
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 0.955

9.  [Volar locking plating for distal radial fractures. Is osteoporosis associated with poorer functional results and higher complications rates?].

Authors:  C Voigt; A Plesz; G Jensen; C Katthagen; H Lill
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 0.955

10.  Failure after osteosynthesis of trochanteric fractures. Where is the limit of osteoporosis?

Authors:  L Konstantinidis; C Papaioannou; P Blanke; A Hirschmüller; N P Südkamp; P Helwig
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.