Literature DB >> 23649496

How to prevent cut-out and cut-through in biaxial proximal femoral nails: is there anything beyond lag screw positioning and tip-apex distance?

Birgit Zirngibl1, Roland Biber, Hermann Josef Bail.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Hip perforation is a major complication in proximal femoral nailing. For biaxial nails, knowledge of their biomechanics is limited. Besides re-evaluation of accepted risk factors like the tip-apex distance (TAD), we analysed the influence of anti-rotational pin length.
METHODS: We compared 22 hip perforation cases to 50 randomly chosen controls. TAD, lag-screw position, angle between lag-screw and femoral neck axis, lag-screw gliding capacity, displacement and anti-rotational pin length were investigated.
RESULTS: Hip perforation was associated with a higher angle of deviation between lag-screw and femoral neck axis (p = 0.001), a lower telescoping capacity of the lag screw (p = 0.02), and higher TAD (p = 0.048). If the anti-rotational pin exceeded a line connecting the tip of the nail and the lag screw (NS line), hip perforation incidence was increased (p = 0.009). Inadequate pin length resulted in an odds ratio of 10.8 for hip perforation (p = 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: In biaxial nails anti-rotational element positioning is underestimated, however, crucial.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23649496      PMCID: PMC3685663          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-013-1898-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  12 in total

1.  Biomechanical evaluation of the proximal femoral nail.

Authors:  Inger B Schipper; Stephen Bresina; Dieter Wahl; Berend Linke; Arie B Van Vugt; Erich Schneider
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  A ten-year analysis of intertrochanteric fractures of the femur.

Authors:  M CLEVELAND; D M BOSWORTH; F R THOMPSON; H J WILSON; T ISHIZUKA
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1959-12       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Sliding hip screw versus the Targon PF nail in the treatment of trochanteric fractures of the hip: a randomised trial of 600 fractures.

Authors:  M J Parker; T R Bowers; G A Pryor
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2012-03

4.  Clinical results of trochanteric fractures treated with the TARGON® proximal femur intramedullary nailing fixation system.

Authors:  Yosuke Kawatani; Kimiaki Nishida; Yoshihisa Anraku; Katsuhiko Kunitake; Yasujiro Tsutsumi
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.586

5.  Reliability of predictors for screw cutout in intertrochanteric hip fractures.

Authors:  Kirstin De Bruijn; Dennis den Hartog; Wim Tuinebreijer; Gert Roukema
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Central head perforation, or "cut through," caused by the helical blade of the proximal femoral nail antirotation.

Authors:  Hans-Curd Frei; Thomas Hotz; Dieter Cadosch; Mark Rudin; Kurt Käch
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.512

7.  Intramedullary osteosynthesis of complex proximal femoral fractures with the Targon PF nail.

Authors:  G Heinert; M J Parker
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2007-10-31       Impact factor: 2.586

8.  ["Cutting out" in pertrochanteric fractures--problem of osteoporosis?].

Authors:  F Bonnaire; A Weber; O Bösl; C Eckhardt; K Schwieger; B Linke
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 1.000

9.  The value of the tip-apex distance in predicting failure of fixation of peritrochanteric fractures of the hip.

Authors:  M R Baumgaertner; S L Curtin; D M Lindskog; J M Keggi
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Finite element analysis of four different implants inserted in different positions to stabilize an idealized trochanteric femoral fracture.

Authors:  Peter Helwig; Gunter Faust; Ulrich Hindenlang; Anja Hirschmüller; Lukas Konstantinidis; Christian Bahrs; Norbert Südkamp; Ralf Schneider
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 2.586

View more
  6 in total

1.  Modified Short Proximal Femoral Nail for Intertrochanteric Fractures of Femur in Indian Patients - our Experience.

Authors:  V Jha; T Ahmed
Journal:  Malays Orthop J       Date:  2020-07

2.  A ceramic bone substitute containing gentamicin gives good outcome in trochanteric hip fractures treated with dynamic hip screw and in revision of total hip arthroplasty: a case series.

Authors:  Mindaugas Stravinskas; Sarunas Tarasevicius; Simonas Laukaitis; Malin Nilsson; Deepak Bushan Raina; Lars Lidgren
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2018-12-06       Impact factor: 2.362

3.  Cemented hemiarthroplasty versus proximal femoral nail antirotation in the management of intertrochanteric femoral fractures in the elderly: a case control study.

Authors:  Zhuangzhuang Jin; Shuoyan Xu; Yue Yang; Yingliang Wei; Yicheng Tian; Ziyuan Wang; Lunhao Bai
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 2.362

4.  Early Experience with the Trochanteric Fixation Nail-Advanced (TFN-A): A Descriptive Review of Thirty-Four Cases from a Single Center.

Authors:  Joshua De Castro Unsay; Ivan Chua Tjun Huat; Ernest Kwek Beng Kee
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 1.251

5.  Loss of Reduction after Cephalomedullary Nail Fixation of Intertrochanteric Femoral Fracture: A Brief Report.

Authors:  Yao Pang; Qi-Fang He; Liu-Long Zhu; Zhen-Yu Bian; Mao-Qiang Li
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 2.071

6.  Cut-out risk factor analysis after intramedullary nailing for the treatment of extracapsular fractures of the proximal femur: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Jae Youn Yoon; Sehan Park; Taehyun Kim; Gun-Il Im
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 2.362

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.