Alexander Maslaris1, Olaf Brinkmann2, Frank Layher3, Georg Matziolis2, Matthias Bungartz2. 1. Department of Orthopedics, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University of Jena, Campus Eisenberg, Klosterlausnitzer Straße 81, 07607, Eisenberg, Germany. alexander_maslaris@hotmail.com. 2. Department of Orthopedics, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University of Jena, Campus Eisenberg, Klosterlausnitzer Straße 81, 07607, Eisenberg, Germany. 3. Department of Orthopedics, Laboratory of Biomechanics, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University of Jena, Campus Eisenberg, Klosterlausnitzer Straße 81, 07607, Eisenberg, Germany.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The increasing number of geriatric traumatology cases has intensified the need to reliably and objectively evaluate local bone quality, the latter poses a decisive factor for the choice of an optimal approach to treat osteoporotic fractures. Osteodensitometry imaging techniques are not routinely available in acute operative settings, nor do they provide objective information on local bone properties specifically needed for the prognosis of implant stability. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study sought to verify ex vivo the feasibility and sensitivity of a novel method for the determination of local bone strength in the acute operative setting (intraoperative osseomechanical strength measurement; IOSM) that is based on the principle of material displacement resistance against the force of a rotary indenter. Samples consisted of human femoral heads obtained after total hip replacement. Comparisons were made with results obtained via conventional dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and quantitative computed tomography (qCT). RESULTS: Regression analyses of the results showed a highly significant correlation between the IOSM and the control methods (r = 0.61 and r = 0.56; p < 0.01), indicating that this new approach qualifies as a reliable tool for the intraoperative evaluation of the intrinsic local bone strength. CONCLUSIONS: The intraoperative integration of this method may support surgeon on taking proper decisions in terms of optimal surgical approaches and prevention of complications inherent to osteoporotic bone.
INTRODUCTION: The increasing number of geriatric traumatology cases has intensified the need to reliably and objectively evaluate local bone quality, the latter poses a decisive factor for the choice of an optimal approach to treat osteoporotic fractures. Osteodensitometry imaging techniques are not routinely available in acute operative settings, nor do they provide objective information on local bone properties specifically needed for the prognosis of implant stability. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study sought to verify ex vivo the feasibility and sensitivity of a novel method for the determination of local bone strength in the acute operative setting (intraoperative osseomechanical strength measurement; IOSM) that is based on the principle of material displacement resistance against the force of a rotary indenter. Samples consisted of human femoral heads obtained after total hip replacement. Comparisons were made with results obtained via conventional dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and quantitative computed tomography (qCT). RESULTS: Regression analyses of the results showed a highly significant correlation between the IOSM and the control methods (r = 0.61 and r = 0.56; p < 0.01), indicating that this new approach qualifies as a reliable tool for the intraoperative evaluation of the intrinsic local bone strength. CONCLUSIONS: The intraoperative integration of this method may support surgeon on taking proper decisions in terms of optimal surgical approaches and prevention of complications inherent to osteoporotic bone.
Entities:
Keywords:
Cutting out; Implant failure; Intraoperative evaluation; Local bone strength; Osteoporotic fracture; Osteosynthesis
Authors: Marc A Müller; Clemens Hengg; Christian Krettek; Detlef van der Velde; Siegfried Eberdorfer; Richard Stange; Gunther O Hofmann; Andreas Platz; Norbert Suhm Journal: J Orthop Res Date: 2015-05-18 Impact factor: 3.494
Authors: C Kammerlander; F Gebhard; C Meier; A Lenich; W Linhart; B Clasbrummel; T Neubauer-Gartzke; M Garcia-Alonso; T Pavelka; M Blauth Journal: Injury Date: 2011-08-19 Impact factor: 2.586
Authors: A Papaioannou; C C Kennedy; G Ioannidis; A Sawka; W M Hopman; L Pickard; J P Brown; R G Josse; S Kaiser; T Anastassiades; D Goltzman; M Papadimitropoulos; A Tenenhouse; J C Prior; W P Olszynski; J D Adachi Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2008-09-19 Impact factor: 4.507