Literature DB >> 11766660

[Experimental examination for optimized stabilisation of trochanteric femur fractures, intra- or extramedullary implant localisation and influence of femur neck component profile on cut-out risk].

W Friedl1, J Clausen.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Fractures of the proximal femur are typical injuries of the elderly. Therefore immediate restoration of weight-bearing capacity and prevention of local complications with the need for of secondary surgical procedures are very important.
METHODS: In an experimental test the weight-bearing capacity under alternating load up to 2,000 N and 4,000 cycles was analysed in the newest implants for extramedullary fixation (the DHS with lateral buttress plate, DHS) and for intramedullary fixation (the gliding nail, GN). If no instability occurred a static maximum load test was performed. To avoid the influence of other variables the tests were performed with sowbone femora with A2, A31, (AO classification) subtrochanteric reversed and subtrochanteric transverse osteotomies. To analyse the influence of long term alternating load and of the biological bone, a pair of cadaver femora were tested with 100,000 cycles of 2,000 N alternating load after GN and DHS osteosynthesis. In a second examination the influence of the profile of the femur neck component on the migration and cut-out risk was tested. Nine head and neck parts of sowbone femora with a A2 osteotomy 1,000 alternating load tests at 1,000 and 1,500 N were performed after GN I beam plate, gamma nail and PFN screw fixation. Additionally, three pairs of cadaver femora were tested with 6,000 cycles from 1,000-3,500 N of alternating load comparing GN vs gamma, GN vs PFN and gamma vs PFN to avoid influence of the biological variability on the ranking.
RESULTS: The weight-bearing capacity of the GN (4,230-5,557 N) was about 100% higher than that of the DHS (2,465-3,049 N). The total deformation was 1/3 higher for the DHS (17.3 +/- 2.06 mm) than for the GN (10.73 +/- 4,33 mm). After 100,000 alternating load cycles no instability and a total deformation of 13.3 mm was found for the GN, but for the DHS instability occurred after 15,800 cycles. The migration of the I-beam GN plate at 1,000 N in sowbone femora was 0.7 mm for the gamma screw 1.69 mm and for the PFN 2 mm but one cut-out was observed. At 1,500 N the difference are even higher, all three PFN showed a cut-out and in two of the three gamma screws rotation of the head and neck around the screw was observed. In the cadaver tests similar differences were found with a migration at least double that of the GN I beam plate for the gamma screw and the PFN double-screw fixation. There was no difference between the gamma and PFN fixation in the cadaver pair test.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11766660     DOI: 10.1007/s001040170041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chirurg        ISSN: 0009-4722            Impact factor:   0.955


  17 in total

1.  [Treatment results and complications after PFN osteosynthesis].

Authors:  B Hohendorff; P Meyer; D Menezes; L Meier; R Elke
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  Does PFNA II avoid lateral cortex impingement for unstable peritrochanteric fractures?

Authors:  George A Macheras; Stefanos D Koutsostathis; Spyridon Galanakos; Konstantinos Kateros; Stamatios A Papadakis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Intramedullary Nailing Combined with Bone Grafting for Benign Lesions of the Proximal Femur.

Authors:  Yan Zhang; Jia-Zhen Li; Xin-Chang Lu; Yi Zhang; Huai-Shuan Zhang; Hai-Long Shi; Zheng Lei; Guang Feng; Wei-Ping Fu
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 2.071

4.  [Treatment results of pertrochanteric and subtrochanteric femoral fractures: a retrospective comparison of PFN and PFNA].

Authors:  J Penzkofer; T Mendel; C Bauer; K Brehme
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.000

5.  ["Cutting out" in pertrochanteric fractures--problem of osteoporosis?].

Authors:  F Bonnaire; A Weber; O Bösl; C Eckhardt; K Schwieger; B Linke
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 1.000

6.  Treatment of Traumatic Femoral Neck Fractures with an Intramedullary Nail in Osteoporotic Bones.

Authors:  Tim Friedrich Raven; Wilhelm Friedl; Arash Moghaddam
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 1.251

7.  Comparison of migration behavior between single and dual lag screw implants for intertrochanteric fracture fixation.

Authors:  George K Kouvidis; Mark B Sommers; Peter V Giannoudis; Pavlos G Katonis; Michael Bottlang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2009-05-18       Impact factor: 2.359

8.  Use of the Gamma3™ nail in a teaching hospital for trochanteric fractures: mechanical complications, functional outcomes, and quality of life.

Authors:  Benjamin Buecking; Christopher Bliemel; Johannes Struewer; Daphne Eschbach; Steffen Ruchholtz; Thorben Müller
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2012-11-23

9.  Long-term results after over 17 years - Intramedullary gliding nail as treatment for traumatic femoral neck fractures.

Authors:  Tim Friedrich Raven; Leonard Höchtl-Lee; Wilhelm Friedl; Arash Moghaddam
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-05-27

10.  Comparison of the Sliding and Femoral Head Rotation among Three Different Femoral Head Fixation Devices for Trochanteric Fractures.

Authors:  Nobuaki Chinzei; Takafumi Hiranaka; Takahiro Niikura; Mitsuo Tsuji; Ryosuke Kuroda; Minoru Doita; Masahiro Kurosaka
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2015-08-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.