Literature DB >> 23702701

Failure after osteosynthesis of trochanteric fractures. Where is the limit of osteoporosis?

L Konstantinidis1, C Papaioannou, P Blanke, A Hirschmüller, N P Südkamp, P Helwig.   

Abstract

SUMMARY: The aim of this study is to identify osteoporosis values, beyond which there is a high risk of osteosynthesis failure. Bone mineral density (BMD) of 30 cadaveric femora with a pertrochanteric fracture osteotomy was correlated to the risk of cut out after osteosynthesis on a biomechanical testing approach. For a BMD less than 250 mg/cm(3), there is a high risk of fixation failure after surgical treatment of pertrochanteric fractures. This value can be regarded as a reference value for future experimental and clinical studies.
INTRODUCTION: Despite continuous modification of intramedullary load carriers for the surgical stabilization of trochanteric fractures, cut out remains the most frequent complication. The aim of this experimental study was to identify threshold osteoporosis values, beyond which there is a high risk of osteosynthesis failure.
METHODS: Bone mineral density (BMD) of 30 cadaveric femora was recorded for the femoral head by QCT measurement. Subsequently, a standardized osteotomy mimicking an unstable trochanteric type fracture was stabilized by intramedullary nailing. The constructs were loaded axially at a force of 2,100 N up to 20,000 cycles. Cut out at the femoral head was documented by radiograph. Statistical evaluation of the cohort group was performed by calculation of relative risk in relation to the BMD values.
RESULTS: In total, there were six cases of cut out after 10,000 cycles. The incidence of cut out for BMD less than 250 mg/cm(3) was 0.55 (5 of 9) and for BMD greater than 250 mg/cm(3), it was 0.05 (1 of 21). Therefore, the relative risk of cut out for BMD <250 mg/cm(3) is 11× greater than for a BMD >250 mg/cm(3). After 20,000 cycles, an additional test caused one cut out (relative risk of cut out for a BMD <250 mg/cm(3) 5.8).
CONCLUSIONS: For a BMD less than 250 mg/cm(3), there is a high risk of fixation failure after surgical treatment of pertrochanteric fractures. Although this value is based on an experimental in vitro study design with all its associated limitations, it can be regarded as a reference value for future experimental and clinical studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23702701     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-013-2392-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  24 in total

1.  Treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures with two different minimal invasive angle-stable plates: Biomechanical comparison studies on cadaveric bones.

Authors:  L Konstantinidis; O Hauschild; N A Beckmann; A Hirschmüller; N P Südkamp; P Helwig
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 2.586

2.  Evaluation of Singh index for assessment of osteoporosis using digital radiography.

Authors:  O Hauschild; N Ghanem; M Oberst; T Baumann; P C Kreuz; M Langer; N P Suedkamp; P Niemeyer
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2008-05-02       Impact factor: 3.528

3.  Treatment of reverse oblique and transverse intertrochanteric fractures with use of an intramedullary nail or a 95 degrees screw-plate: a prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  Christophe Sadowski; Anne Lübbeke; Marc Saudan; Nicolas Riand; Richard Stern; Pierre Hoffmeyer
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities.

Authors:  G Bergmann; G Deuretzbacher; M Heller; F Graichen; A Rohlmann; J Strauss; G N Duda
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Effects of muscle-equivalent forces on the biomechanical behavior of proximal femur fracture models: a pilot study on artificial bones.

Authors:  Lukas Konstantinidis; Christoforos Papaioannou; Anja Hirschmüller; Theodoros Pavlidis; Steffen Schröter; Norbert P Südkamp; Peter Helwig
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.617

6.  [Classification and international AO-documentation of femur fractures].

Authors:  M E Müller
Journal:  Unfallheilkunde       Date:  1980-05

7.  Predictive factors for cutting-out in femoral intramedullary nailing.

Authors:  Antonio Lobo-Escolar; Eduardo Joven; Daniel Iglesias; Antonio Herrera
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 2.586

8.  Salvage procedures for trochanteric femoral fractures after internal fixation failure: biomechanical comparison of a plate fixator and the dynamic condylar screw.

Authors:  L Konstantinidis; C Papaioannou; A Mehlhorn; A Hirschmüller; N P Südkamp; P Helwig
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.617

9.  Biomechanical evaluation of a new augmentation method for enhanced screw fixation in osteoporotic proximal femoral fractures.

Authors:  P von der Linden; A Gisep; V Boner; M Windolf; A Appelt; N Suhm
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 10.  Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in adults.

Authors:  Martyn J Parker; Helen Hg Handoll
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-09-08
View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Intertrochanteric fractures: a review of fixation methods.

Authors:  Senthil Nathan Sambandam; Jayadev Chandrasekharan; Varatharaj Mounasamy; Cyril Mauffrey
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2016-03-30

2.  Comparison Between Femoral Neck Systems and Cannulated Cancellous Screws in Treating Femoral Neck Fractures: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Peng Tian; Lan Kuang; Zhi-Jun Li; Gui-Jun Xu; Xin Fu
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2022-07-06

3.  The long and short of cephalomedullary nails in the treatment of osteoporotic pertrochanteric fracture.

Authors:  Choon Chiet Hong; Nazrul Nashi; Milindu Chanaka Makandura; Jiong Hao Jonathan Tan; Luke Peter; Diarmuid Murphy
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 1.858

4.  [Biaxial reconstruction nail for pertrochanteric femoral fractures. Osteosynthesis].

Authors:  S Weihrauch; G Gradl; M Beck; R Rotter; T Mittlmeier; P Gierer
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.000

5.  Trochanteric fixation nail advanced with helical blade and cement augmentation: early experience with a retrospective cohort.

Authors:  L Henry Goodnough; Harsh Wadhwa; Seth S Tigchelaar; Malcolm R DeBaun; Michael J Chen; Julius A Bishop; Michael J Gardner
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2020-08-17

6.  Cement augmentation of the proximal femoral nail antirotation for the treatment of two intertrochanteric fractures - a comparative finite element study.

Authors:  Liqin Zheng; Xinmin Chen; Yongze Zheng; Xingpeng He; Jingxiong Wu; Ziling Lin
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Hip Replacement as Alternative to Intramedullary Nail in Elderly Patients with Unstable Intertrochanteric Fracture: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Jia-Bao Ju; Pei-Xun Zhang; Bao-Guo Jiang
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 2.071

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.