Literature DB >> 9764228

Failure of femoral head fixation: a cadaveric analysis of lag screw cut-out with the gamma locking nail and AO dynamic hip screw.

R C Haynes1, R G Pöll, A W Miles, R B Weston.   

Abstract

The most commonly reported failure mode of sliding hip screws in published literature is cut-out of the lag screw. This study investigates the resistance to failure of the femoral head, with lag screws used in two types of sliding hip screws, the gamma locking nail (Howmedica) and the dynamic hip screw (DHS) (Synthes). The investigation consisted of biomechanical tests under static loading conditions on 12 pairs of cadaveric femoral heads, to establish the failure loads due to screw cut-out for the two implant lag screws. The gamma nail appeared to reduce the tendency to cut-out in the osteoporotic bone (soft) associated with elderly patients in whom these devices are commonly used (p < 0.05). In high density bone (hard) the gamma lag screw also appeared to be stronger, because the DHS showed a tendency to bend. The larger diameter of the gamma nail lag screw resists bending and appears to reduce the risk of cut-out compared with the DHS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9764228     DOI: 10.1016/s0020-1383(97)00035-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  33 in total

Review 1.  Fixation principles in metaphyseal bone--a patent based review.

Authors:  R Curtis; J Goldhahn; R Schwyn; P Regazzoni; N Suhm
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-11-03       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Treatment of femoral subtrochanteric fractures with proximal lateral femur locking plates.

Authors:  Sun-Jun Hu; Shi-Min Zhang; Guang-Rong Yu
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 0.513

3.  Is tip apex distance as important as we think? A biomechanical study examining optimal lag screw placement.

Authors:  Patrick Kane; Bryan Vopat; Wendell Heard; Nikhil Thakur; David Paller; Sarath Koruprolu; Christopher Born
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Intrapelvic migration of hip lag screw of proximal femoral nail-sequele to a paradoxical reverse Z effect and their critical analysis.

Authors:  Hitesh Lal; Deepak Kumar Sharma; Deepak Mittal
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2012-06-16

5.  Intramedullary fixation of intertrochanteric hip fractures: a comparison of two implant designs.

Authors:  Nicolas E Efstathopoulos; Vassilios S Nikolaou; John T Lazarettos
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-05-31       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Early experience about Anteversa(®) plate for lateral femur fractures.

Authors:  Enrico Bonicoli; Lorenzo Andreani; Nicola Piolanti; Lorenzo Dolfi; Michele Lisanti
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2012-12-20

7.  Screw-blade fixation systems in Pauwels three femoral neck fractures: a biomechanical evaluation.

Authors:  Matthias Knobe; Simon Altgassen; Klaus-Jürgen Maier; Gertraud Gradl-Dietsch; Chris Kaczmarek; Sven Nebelung; Kajetan Klos; Bong-Sung Kim; Boyko Gueorguiev; Klemens Horst; Benjamin Buecking
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-08-06       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Unstable intertrochanteric femur fractures: is there a consensus on definition and treatment in Germany?

Authors:  Matthias Knobe; Gertraud Gradl; Andreas Ladenburger; Ivan S Tarkin; Hans-Christoph Pape
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Primary hemiarthroplasty for unstable osteoporotic intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly: A retrospective case series.

Authors:  Kh Sancheti; Pk Sancheti; Ak Shyam; S Patil; Q Dhariwal; R Joshi
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.251

10.  Comparison of migration behavior between single and dual lag screw implants for intertrochanteric fracture fixation.

Authors:  George K Kouvidis; Mark B Sommers; Peter V Giannoudis; Pavlos G Katonis; Michael Bottlang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2009-05-18       Impact factor: 2.359

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.