| Literature DB >> 17340227 |
Håkan Geijer1, Mats Geijer, Lillemor Forsberg, Susanne Kheddache, Patrik Sund.
Abstract
In diagnostic radiology, medical-grade monochrome displays are usually recommended because of their higher luminance. Standard color displays can be used as a less expensive alternative, but have a lower luminance. The aim of the present study was to compare image quality for these two types of displays. Images of a CDRAD contrast-detail phantom were read by four radiologists using a 2-megapixel (MP) color display (143 cd/m(2) maximum luminance) as well as 2-MP (295 cd/m(2)) and 3-MP monochrome displays. Thirty lumbar spine radiographs were also read by four radiologists using the color and the 2-MP monochrome display in a visual grading analysis (VGA). Very small differences were found between the displays when reading the CDRAD images. The VGA scores were -0.28 for the color and -0.25 for the monochrome display (p = 0.24; NS). It thus seems possible to use color displays in diagnostic radiology provided that grayscale adjustment is used.Entities:
Mesh：
Year: 2007 PMID： 17340227 PMCID： PMC3043910 DOI： 10.1007/s10278-007-9028-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Digit Imaging ISSN： 0897-1889 Impact factor: 4.056