Literature DB >> 14747935

Effect of room illuminance on monitor black level luminance and monitor calibration.

K Chakrabarti1, R V Kaczmarek, J A Thomas, A Romanyukha.   

Abstract

In this article we demonstrate the effect of room illuminance and surrounding monitor black level luminance on image quality for soft copy interpretation. Luminance values of a 10% central target and image quality evaluations and observer performance using a contrast-detail mammography (CDMAM) phantom demonstrate these effects. Our results indicate that high room illuminance has a more damaging effect on image quality when the surrounding monitor luminance is 0% to 5% of the maximum monitor luminance. The effect of room illuminance is less obvious when the surrounding monitor luminance is 20% of the maximum.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14747935      PMCID: PMC3044073          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-003-1720-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  11 in total

1.  Effect of display luminance on the feature detection rates of masses in mammograms.

Authors:  B M Hemminger; A W Dillon; R E Johnston; K E Muller; M C Deluca; C S Coffey; E D Pisano
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Contrast-detail characteristic evaluations of several display devices.

Authors:  J Wang; J Anderson; T Lane; C Stetson; J Moore
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Optimization of viewing conditions and phantom image quality evaluations on GE DMR and full-field digital mammography system.

Authors:  K Chakrabarti; J A Thomas; R V Kaczmarek; R W Waynant; M F Loscocco
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Evaluation of a flat CRT monitor for use in radiology.

Authors:  H Roehrig; E A Krupinski; T Furukawa
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Testing optimum viewing conditions for mammographic image displays.

Authors:  R W Waynant; K Chakrabarti; R A Kaczmarek; I Dagenais
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Image quality degradation by light scattering in display devices.

Authors:  M J Flynn; A Badano
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  Flat-panel digital mammography system: contrast-detail comparison between screen-film radiographs and hard-copy images.

Authors:  Sankararaman Suryanarayanan; Andrew Karellas; Srinivasan Vedantham; Hetal Ved; Stephen P Baker; Carl J D'Orsi
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Why and how is soft copy reading possible in clinical practice?

Authors:  T Mertelmeier
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.056

9.  Improved sensitivity and specificity of mammograms by producing uniform luminance from viewboxes.

Authors:  R W Waynant; K Chakrabarti; R Kaczmerak; O Suleiman; A Rowberg
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.056

10.  Effect of different background lighting conditions on diagnostic performance of digital and film images.

Authors:  R A Cederberg; N L Frederiksen; B W Benson; J D Shulman
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 2.419

View more
  8 in total

1.  Image quality assurance of soft copy display systems.

Authors:  Emily Seto; Ali Ursani; Joseph A Cafazzo; Peter G Rossos; Anthony C Easty
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Assessment of PACS display systems.

Authors:  John E Aldrich; John D Rutledge
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Optimization of reading conditions for flat panel displays.

Authors:  J A Thomas; K Chakrabarti; R V Kaczmarek; A Maslennikov; C A Mitchell; A Romanyukha
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Validated simple tip to aid eliminating light scatter in viewing overexposed radiographs.

Authors:  Haydar A J Al Hussainy; Smeeta Wong
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  Comparison of color LCD and medical-grade monochrome LCD displays in diagnostic radiology.

Authors:  Håkan Geijer; Mats Geijer; Lillemor Forsberg; Susanne Kheddache; Patrik Sund
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Development of a randomised contrast detail digital phantom for observer detectability study.

Authors:  Ms Nizam; Kh Ng; Bjj Abdullah
Journal:  Biomed Imaging Interv J       Date:  2006-07-01

7.  Effect of ambient lighting on liquid-crystal displays with different types of surface treatment.

Authors:  Michinobu Matsuyama; Junji Morishita; Hiroshi Akamine; Shogo Tokurei; Hidetake Yabuuchi; Yasuhiko Nakamura; Noriyuki Hashimoto; Masafumi Ohki
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2012-09-28

8.  Effect of fluorescent lighting on the color of liquid-crystal displays.

Authors:  Yudai Yano; Junji Morishita; Hiroshi Akamine; Noriyuki Hashimoto; Yasuhiko Nakamura; Hidetake Yabuuchi
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2014-06-14
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.