Literature DB >> 24007183

An evaluation of organic light emitting diode monitors for medical applications: great timing, but luminance artifacts.

Tobias Elze1, Christopher Taylor, Peter J Bex.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In contrast to the dominant medical liquid crystal display (LCD) technology, organic light-emitting diode (OLED) monitors control the display luminance via separate light-emitting diodes for each pixel and are therefore supposed to overcome many previously documented temporal artifacts of medical LCDs. We assessed the temporal and luminance characteristics of the only currently available OLED monitor designed for use in the medical treatment field (SONY PVM2551MD) and checked the authors' main findings with another SONY OLED device (PVM2541).
METHODS: Temporal properties of the photometric output were measured with an optical transient recorder. Luminances of the three color primaries and white for all 256 digital driving levels (DDLs) were measured with a spectroradiometer. Between the luminances of neighboring DDLs, just noticeable differences were calculated according to a perceptual model developed for medical displays. Luminances of full screen (FS) stimuli were compared to luminances of smaller stimuli with identical DDLs.
RESULTS: All measured luminance transition times were below 300 μs. Luminances were independent of the luminance in the preceding frame. However, for the single color primaries, up to 50.5% of the luminances of neighboring DDLs were not perceptually distinguishable. If two color primaries were active simultaneously, between 36.7% and 55.1% of neighboring luminances for increasing DDLs of the third primary were even decreasing. Moreover, luminance saturation effects were observed when too many pixels were active simultaneously. This effect was strongest for white; a small white patch was close to 400 cd/m(2), but in FS the luminance of white saturated at 162 cd/m(2). Due to different saturation levels, the luminance of FS green and FS yellow could exceed the luminance of FS white for identical DDLs.
CONCLUSIONS: The OLED temporal characteristics are excellent and superior to those of LCDs. However, the OLEDs revealed severe perceptually relevant artifacts with implications for applicability to medical imaging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24007183      PMCID: PMC3772941          DOI: 10.1118/1.4818056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  9 in total

1.  LCDs are better: psychophysical and photometric estimates of the temporal characteristics of CRT and LCD monitors.

Authors:  Hayley E P Lagroix; Matthew R Yanko; Thomas M Spalek
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Achieving precise display timing in visual neuroscience experiments.

Authors:  Tobias Elze
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 2.390

3.  Temporal response of medical liquid crystal displays.

Authors:  Hongye Liang; Aldo Badano
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Comparison of color LCD and medical-grade monochrome LCD displays in diagnostic radiology.

Authors:  Håkan Geijer; Mats Geijer; Lillemor Forsberg; Susanne Kheddache; Patrik Sund
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Chromaticity and correlated color temperature of the white point in medical liquid-crystal display.

Authors:  Hiroshi Akamine; Junji Morishita; Michinobu Matsuyama; Yasuhiko Nakamura; Noriyuki Hashimoto; Fukai Toyofuku
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Liquid crystal display response time estimation for medical applications.

Authors:  Tobias Elze; Thomas G Tanner
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 7.  Misspecifications of stimulus presentation durations in experimental psychology: a systematic review of the psychophysics literature.

Authors:  Tobias Elze
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Comparison of the commercial color LCD and the medical monochrome LCD using randomized object test patterns.

Authors:  Jay Wu; Tung H Wu; Rou P Han; Shu J Chang; Cheng T Shih; Jing Y Sun; Shih M Hsu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Temporal properties of liquid crystal displays: implications for vision science experiments.

Authors:  Tobias Elze; Thomas G Tanner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total
  5 in total

1.  On the number of perceivable blur levels in naturalistic images.

Authors:  Christopher Patrick Taylor; Peter J Bex
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Fullfield and extrafoveal visual evoked potentials in healthy eyes: reference data for a curved OLED display.

Authors:  Sabine Baumgarten; Tabea Hoberg; Tibor Lohmann; Babac Mazinani; Peter Walter; Antonis Koutsonas
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-09-10       Impact factor: 1.854

3.  Humans perceive flicker artifacts at 500 Hz.

Authors:  James Davis; Yi-Hsuan Hsieh; Hung-Chi Lee
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Pattern visual evoked potentials elicited by organic electroluminescence screen.

Authors:  Celso Soiti Matsumoto; Kei Shinoda; Harue Matsumoto; Hideaki Funada; Kakeru Sasaki; Haruka Minoda; Takeshi Iwata; Atsushi Mizota
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Accuracy and precision of stimulus timing and reaction times with Unreal Engine and SteamVR.

Authors:  Michael Wiesing; Gereon R Fink; Ralph Weidner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.