Literature DB >> 15692869

Use of a human visual system model to predict observer performance with CRT vs LCD display of images.

Elizabeth A Krupinski1, Jeffrey Johnson, Hans Roehrig, John Nafziger, Jiahua Fan, Jeffery Lubin.   

Abstract

This Project evaluated a human visual system model (JNDmetrix) based on just noticeable difference (JND) and frequency-channel vision-modeling principles to assess whether a Cathode ray tube (CRT) or a liquid crystal display (LCD) monochrome display monitor would yield better observer performance in radiographic interpretation. Key physical characteristics, such as veiling glare and modulation transfer function (MTF) of the CRT and LCD were measured. Regions of interest from mammographic images with masses of different contrast levels were shown once on each display to six radiologists using a counterbalanced presentation order. The images were analyzed using the JNDmetrix model. Performance as measured by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was significantly better overall on the LCD display (P = 0.0120). The JNDmetrix model predicted the result (P = 0.0046) and correlation between human and computer observers was high (r (2) (quadratic) = 0.997). The results suggest that observer performance with LCD displays is superior to CRT viewing, at least for on-axis viewing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15692869      PMCID: PMC3047185          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-004-1016-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  10 in total

1.  Some historical remarks on picture archiving and communication systems.

Authors:  H K Huang
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.790

Review 2.  Enterprise PACS and image distribution.

Authors:  H K Huang
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.790

3.  Using a human visual system model to optimize soft-copy mammography display: influence of display phosphor.

Authors:  Elizabeth Krupinski; Jeffrey Johnson; Hans Roehrig; Jeffrey Lubin
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 4.  A review of medical imaging informatics.

Authors:  Usha Sinha; Alex Bui; Ricky Taira; John Dionisio; Craig Morioka; David Johnson; Hooshang Kangarloo
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 5.691

5.  Receiver operating characteristic rating analysis. Generalization to the population of readers and patients with the jackknife method.

Authors:  D D Dorfman; K S Berbaum; C E Metz
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 6.016

6.  Using a human visual system model to optimize soft-copy mammography display: influence of MTF compensation.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Krupinski; Jeffrey Johnson; Hans Roehrig; Michael Engstrom; Jiahua Fan; John Nafziger; Jeffrey Lubin; William J Dallas
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.173

7.  PACS monitors: an evolution of radiologist's viewing techniques.

Authors:  W F Bennett; K K Vaswani; J A Mendiola; D G Spigos
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2002-03-21       Impact factor: 4.056

8.  Angular dependence of the luminance and contrast in medical monochrome liquid crystal displays.

Authors:  Aldo Badano; Michael J Flynn; Sandrine Martin; Jerzy Kanicki
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Method for measuring veiling glare in high-performance display devices.

Authors:  A Badano; M J Flynn
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  2000-05-01       Impact factor: 1.980

10.  Liquid-crystal display monitors and cathode-ray tube monitors: a comparison of observer performance in the detection of small solitary pulmonary nodules.

Authors:  Soon-A Hwang; Joon Beom Seo; Byeong-Kyoo Choi; Kyung-Hyun Do; Sung Min Ko; Soo-Hyun Lee; Jin-Seong Lee; Jae-Woo Song; Koun-Sik Song; Tae-Hwan Lim
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2003 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 3.500

  10 in total
  11 in total

1.  Differential use of image enhancement techniques by experienced and inexperienced observers.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Krupinski; Hans Roehrig; William Dallas; Jiahua Fan
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Optimization of reading conditions for flat panel displays.

Authors:  J A Thomas; K Chakrabarti; R V Kaczmarek; A Maslennikov; C A Mitchell; A Romanyukha
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Digital mammography: comparative performance of color LCD and monochrome CRT displays.

Authors:  Ehsan Samei; Ananth Poolla; Michael J Ulissey; John M Lewin
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.173

4.  Comparison of color LCD and medical-grade monochrome LCD displays in diagnostic radiology.

Authors:  Håkan Geijer; Mats Geijer; Lillemor Forsberg; Susanne Kheddache; Patrik Sund
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Quantitative image quality evaluation of MR images using perceptual difference models.

Authors:  Jun Miao; Donglai Huo; David L Wilson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Pan-Canadian evaluation of irreversible compression ratios ("lossy" compression) for development of national guidelines.

Authors:  David Koff; Peter Bak; Paul Brownrigg; Danoush Hosseinzadeh; April Khademi; Alex Kiss; Luigi Lepanto; Tracy Michalak; Harry Shulman; Andrew Volkening
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2008-10-18       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  Effect of display monitor devices on intra-oral radiographic caries diagnosis.

Authors:  Kazuyuki Araki; Mamiko Fujikura; Tsukasa Sano
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-01-18       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 8.  The Empirical Foundations of Teleradiology and Related Applications: A Review of the Evidence.

Authors:  Rashid L Bashshur; Elizabeth A Krupinski; James H Thrall; Noura Bashshur
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 3.536

9.  Structural similarity index family for image quality assessment in radiological images.

Authors:  Gabriel Prieto Renieblas; Agustín Turrero Nogués; Alberto Muñoz González; Nieves Gómez-Leon; Eduardo Guibelalde Del Castillo
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-07-26

10.  Psychophysical contrast calibration.

Authors:  Long To; Russell L Woods; Robert B Goldstein; Eli Peli
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 1.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.