Literature DB >> 17219145

The effect of dose reduction and feasibility of edge-preserving noise reduction on the detection of liver lesions using MSCT.

Johannes Wessling1, Rainer Esseling, Rainer Raupach, Stefanie Fockenberg, Nani Osada, Joachim Gerss, Walter Heindel, Roman Fischbach.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of dose reduction and the potential of noise reduction filters on image quality and the detection of liver lesions using MSCT. Twenty-nine patients with a total of 40 liver lesions underwent 16-slice CT (120 kV; 180 mAs). Virtual noise was added to CT raw datasets simulating effective mAs levels of 155, 130, 105, 80, 55, 30 and 10 mAs. All datasets were post-processed with an edge-preserving noise-reduction filter (ANR-3D), yielding a total of 15 datasets per patient. Ten radiologists performed independent evaluations of image quality, the presence of liver lesions and diagnostic confidence. Quantitative noise and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) were obtained. Superior image quality (P < 0.02), reduction of image noise (P < 0.001) and the increase of lesion-to-liver CNR (P < 0.001) were observed in images processed with the ANR-3D filter. Sensitivity for lesion detection remained unchanged down to 105 mAs (CTDI(w) 6.6 mGy) without filter and 80 mAs (CTDI(w) 5.1 mGy) with ANR-3D. Confidence was rated significantly higher for datasets reconstructed with ANR-3D. The use of a noise-reducing, but edge-preserving filter (ANR-3D) is a promising option to reduce further the radiation dose in liver CT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17219145     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-006-0545-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  17 in total

1.  Pulmonary nodules: experimental and clinical studies at low-dose CT.

Authors:  S Diederich; H Lenzen; R Windmann; Z Puskas; T M Yelbuz; S Henneken; T Klaiber; M Eameri; N Roos; P E Peters
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Effective radiation doses in CT colonography: results of an inventory among research institutions.

Authors:  Sebastiaan Jensch; Rogier E van Gelder; Henk W Venema; Johannes B Reitsma; Patrick M M Bossuyt; Johan S Laméris; Jaap Stoker
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-01-18       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  A PC program for estimating organ dose and effective dose values in computed tomography.

Authors:  W A Kalender; B Schmidt; M Zankl; M Schmidt
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Clinical comparison of standard-dose and 50% reduced-dose abdominal CT: effect on image quality.

Authors:  Mannudeep K Kalra; Srinivasa Prasad; Sanjay Saini; Michael A Blake; Jose Varghese; Elkan F Halpern; James H Thrall; James T Rhea
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Computer-simulated radiation dose reduction for abdominal multidetector CT of pediatric patients.

Authors:  Donald P Frush; Christopher C Slack; Caroline L Hollingsworth; George S Bisset; Lane F Donnelly; Jiang Hsieh; Trudy Lavin-Wensell; John R Mayo
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Dose reduction in CT examination of children by an attenuation-based on-line modulation of tube current (CARE Dose).

Authors:  Holger Greess; Anton Nömayr; Heiko Wolf; Ulrich Baum; Michael Lell; Bernhard Böwing; Willi Kalender; Werner A Bautz
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2002-02-02       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Improvement of image quality of multislice spiral CT scans of the head and neck region using a raw data-based multidimensional adaptive filtering (MAF) technique.

Authors:  Ulrich Baum; Katharina Anders; Gregor Steinbichler; Michael Lell; Holger Greess; Thomas Riedel; Marc Kachelriess; Willi A Kalender; Werner A Bautz
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-08-24       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Screening for early lung cancer with low-dose spiral computed tomography: results of annual follow-up examinations in asymptomatic smokers.

Authors:  Stefan Diederich; Michael Thomas; Michael Semik; Horst Lenzen; Nikolaus Roos; Anushe Weber; Walter Heindel; Dag Wormanns
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-01-16       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Feasibility of ultra-low-dose multislice CT colonography for the detection of colorectal lesions: preliminary experience.

Authors:  Riccardo Iannaccone; Andrea Laghi; Carlo Catalano; Filippo Mangiapane; Francesca Piacentini; Roberto Passariello
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2002-09-21       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  CT colonography: Protocol optimization with multi-detector row CT--study in an anthropomorphic colon phantom.

Authors:  Johannes Wessling; Roman Fischbach; Norbert Meier; Thomas Allkemper; Jutta Klusmeier; Karl Ludwig; Walter Heindel
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  [Strategies for reducing the CT radiation dose].

Authors:  S T Schindera; C Nauer; R Treier; P Trueb; G von Allmen; P Vock; Z Szucs-Farkas
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  Deriving the modulation transfer function of CT from extremely noisy edge profiles.

Authors:  Issei Mori; Yoshio Machida
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2008-10-07

3.  Diagnostic accuracy of CE-CT, MRI and FDG PET/CT for detecting colorectal cancer liver metastases in patients considered eligible for hepatic resection and/or local ablation.

Authors:  Kim Sivesgaard; Lars P Larsen; Michael Sørensen; Stine Kramer; Sven Schlander; Nerijus Amanavicius; Arindam Bharadwaz; Dennis Tønner Nielsen; Frank Viborg Mortensen; Erik Morre Pedersen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Accuracy of virtual monochromatic images generated by the decomposition of photoelectric absorption and Compton scatter in dual-energy computed tomography.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Sato; Chifumi Sato; Ayami Takahashi; Hirokazu Takano; Shingo Kayano; Ayana Ishiguro; Yumi Takane; Tomohiro Kaneta
Journal:  Phys Eng Sci Med       Date:  2022-01-28

Review 5.  [Radiation dose in computed tomography. Risks and challenges].

Authors:  M Prokop
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 0.635

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.